drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Hyde <julianh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Drill bylaws
Date Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:15:47 GMT
I think Jacques is probably right and Lazy Consensus is better. I have not experienced a crisis
where a commit is contentious, so it’s hypothetical for me. Changing my vote:

0 (binding)

Julian


On Oct 7, 2014, at 9:14 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org> wrote:

> I've given this some more thought and I think should fall back to Lazy
> Conesus on code commits.  Given that the community is still young and we
> have okay but not great diversity, I think it would be best if we made sure
> that smaller contingents in the community are heard.  I prefer to be
> conservative in making sure each voice is heard early in the development of
> Drill.  If we find that the project becomes gridlocked by this, it would be
> reasonable to update the bylaws to use a lazy majority fallback instead.
> 
> As such, I'm leaning towards a negative vote on the current bylaws. That
> said, I'd like to hear from others on how they feel about this.  Thoughts
> people?
> 
> Jacques
> 
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Steven Phillips <sphillips@maprtech.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Lazy Majority seems fine to me. Do we really want to allow a single
>> dissenting vote to hold up needed changes?
>> 
>> It's possible at some point there me be a split in the community over the
>> direction that Drill should take,  and requiring consensus could result in
>> the project coming to a stand still.
>> 
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> I just got back after vacation so haven't had a chance to get caught up
>> on
>>> email.
>>> 
>>> What was the thinking of using Lazy approval > Lazy Majority versus using
>>> Lazy Approval > Lazy Consensus for code changes?
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Tomer Shiran <tshiran@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> In order for Drill to graduate to a TLP, we need to finalize the
>>> project's
>>>> bylaws. Here's the latest proposal that has been shared/discussed on
>> this
>>>> list:
>>>> 
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DRILL/Proposed+Bylaws
>>>> 
>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours. It will close on Oct 9, 4pm PT.
>>>> 
>>>> [ ] +1
>>>> [ ] +0
>>>> [ ] -1
>>>> 
>>>> Please indicate whether your vote is binding or non-binding.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Tomer
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Steven Phillips
>> Software Engineer
>> 
>> mapr.com
>> 


Mime
View raw message