drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Altekruse <altekruseja...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Drill bylaws
Date Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:09:16 GMT
I am not re-sending my vote to prevent a double count, but I am
re-affirming my previous vote given the small change.

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Julian Hyde <julianhyde@gmail.com> wrote:

> Now the document has been modified, changing my vote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Julian
>
> On Oct 10, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Tomer Shiran <tshiran@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The document should have had that sentence removed so that there's no
> > difference between merge scenario and normal commit scenario. I fixed it
> > now.
> >
> > I assume everyone else voted based on the assumption that this was
> removed,
> > as it was discussed on the list, so I won't restart the vote unless
> someone
> > really wants to. Anyone can, of course, change their vote prior to the
> vote
> > closing.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Tomer said that it makes sense to remove ", unless the code change
> >> represents a merge from a branch, in which case three +1s are required”
> but
> >> the bylaws still contain that clause.
> >>
> >> -1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> Julian
> >>
> >>
> >> On Oct 9, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Tomer Shiran <tshiran@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> In order for Drill to graduate to a TLP, we need to finalize the
> project's
> >> bylaws. I am restarting the vote here based on the feedback and
> discussions
> >> on the list:
> >>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DRILL/Proposed+Bylaws
> >>
> >> The vote will be open for 72 hours. It will close on Oct 12, 3pm PT. I
> will
> >> then send out the TLP graduation vote.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1
> >> [ ] +0
> >> [ ] -1
> >>
> >> Please indicate whether your vote is binding or non-binding.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Tomer
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message