drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From paul-rogers <...@git.apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] drill pull request #666: DRILL-4956: Temporary tables support
Date Tue, 06 Dec 2016 06:12:26 GMT
Github user paul-rogers commented on a diff in the pull request:

    --- Diff: exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/WriterRecordBatch.java
    @@ -174,10 +174,15 @@ protected void setupNewSchema() throws IOException {
         schema = container.getSchema();
    +  /** Partially written data will be removed, otherwise clean up will be performed. */
       private void closeWriter() {
         if (recordWriter != null) {
           try {
    -        recordWriter.cleanup();
    +        if (processed) {
    +          recordWriter.cleanup();
    +        } else {
    +          recordWriter.abort();
    +        }
    --- End diff --
    Can these fail? If so, should we set the recordWriter to null in the finally section so
that the writer is marked as closed even in the failed-close case?
    Also, we mark the context as failed below. Must the caller check this status and propagate
the error up the call stack? Does this happen? Should this method throw an exception instead
to force the attention of the caller?

If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.

View raw message