drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From GitBox <...@apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] amansinha100 commented on a change in pull request #1381: DRILL-6475: Unnest: Null fieldId Pointer.
Date Sun, 15 Jul 2018 03:25:59 GMT
amansinha100 commented on a change in pull request #1381: DRILL-6475: Unnest: Null fieldId
URL: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/1381#discussion_r202530325

 File path: exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/physical/visitor/JoinPrelRenameVisitor.java
 @@ -19,36 +19,70 @@
 import java.util.ArrayList;
 import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import com.google.common.base.Preconditions;
+import org.apache.calcite.rel.type.RelDataType;
+import org.apache.calcite.rel.type.RelDataTypeField;
+import org.apache.calcite.rex.RexBuilder;
+import org.apache.calcite.rex.RexNode;
 import org.apache.drill.exec.planner.physical.JoinPrel;
 import org.apache.drill.exec.planner.physical.LateralJoinPrel;
 import org.apache.drill.exec.planner.physical.Prel;
 import org.apache.calcite.rel.RelNode;
 import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.planner.physical.UnnestPrel;
 public class JoinPrelRenameVisitor extends BasePrelVisitor<Prel, Void, RuntimeException>{
+  private final Map<String, Prel> sourceOperatorRegistry = new HashMap();
   private static JoinPrelRenameVisitor INSTANCE = new JoinPrelRenameVisitor();
   public static Prel insertRenameProject(Prel prel){
     return prel.accept(INSTANCE, null);
+  private void register(Prel toRegister) {
+    this.sourceOperatorRegistry.put(toRegister.getClass().getSimpleName(), toRegister);
 Review comment:
   It is odd to register the mapping of class name to the Prel.  The association of a LateralJoin
to Unnest should ideally be done through instances of the class.  i.e  a particular Unnest
instance is associated with a particular Lateral instance (each Lateral can be associated
with multiple Unnest instances), otherwise there is potential for bugs due to incorrect association.
   Thoughts ? 

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:

With regards,
Apache Git Services

View raw message