Message view | « Date » · « Thread » |
---|---|
Top | « Date » · « Thread » |
From | Adam Gilmore <dragoncu...@gmail.com> |
Subject | Re: Query planning cost |
Date | Fri, 08 May 2015 00:57:25 GMT |
Yep - it's a tad confusing. As Jacques said, it's definitely running the scans in parallel, but it does seem pretty much linear. On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Adam Gilmore <adam@pharmadata.net.au> > wrote: > > > We're getting about a 350ms delay for 70 files, about 200ms for 35 files, > > about 20-30ms for 1 file. > > > > That is impressively linear. 25ms + files * 4.7 with only 5-10ms error. > R^2 = 0.997 > | |
Mime |
|
View raw message |