etch-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oliora <oli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: I want to be participated in Etch developing
Date Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:41:11 GMT
Scott, Youngjin,
thank you!

Andrey

On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Youngjin Park (youngjpa) <
youngjpa@cisco.com> wrote:

> C-binding can be used in embedded environment usefully.
>
> Youngjin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: scott comer [mailto:wert1y@mac.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 7:40 AM
> To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: I want to be participated in Etch developing
>
> mainly because a c binding would be more widely useful, cisco had
> several projects that were c-based.
> think about routers...
>
> scott out
>
> Andrey Upadyshev wrote:
> > Thank you, Scott,
> > I will check c-binding sources and notes and make some decision about
> > c++-binding implementation.
> >
> > One more question, why etch start making a C-binding instead of a
> > C++-binding?
> > I ask it because it seems that a C language is not so popular as C++
> > and because a C++-binding can use a power of a well known Boost
> library.
> >
> > Andrey
> >
> > scott comer wrote:
> >> Oliora wrote:
> >>> Hello, all!
> >>>
> >>> I want to be participated in Etch developing.
> >>>
> >>> I am interesting in creation of a C++ and Python language binding
> (both
> >>> runtime and compiler parts) and I can be helpful because I have a
> good
> >>> knowledge in C++ (~ 5 years of a commercial developing) and some
> >>> knowledge
> >>> in Python (~ 3 month of a developing).
> >>>
> >>> Andrey Upadyshev
> >>>
> >>> P.S. Sorry for my English
> >>>
> >>>
> >> hi andrey,
> >>
> >> one idea for a c++ binding would be to use the c binding. the
> >> existing c binding needs some
> >> small amount of work to make it compile and build. there are notes
> >> left behind by the author, but
> >> nobody has yet had time to figure it out. one of our committers,
> >> youngjin park, has also offered
> >> to take it on. once the runtime is made to work, a compiler to
> >> generate code using the runtime
> >> would be pretty easy.
> >>
> >> my thinking is, once you understand the way the c binding works, you
> >> could c++ify it. or start
> >> over and use c# or java as templates / examples.
> >>
> >> the source code for the c binding is on trunk, which is currently
> >> more or less the same as the
> >> 1.1 dev stream.
> >>
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/etch/trunk/
> >>
> >> notes are here:
> >>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/etch/trunk/binding-c/runtime/c
> /project/notes/<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/etch/trunk/binding-c/runtime/c%0A/project/notes/>
> >>
> >>
> >> i believe the current build is using the visual studio 2003. (the
> >> rest of the etch build uses
> >> vs 2005).
> >>
> >> perhaps james will say something about the status of the python
> binding.
> >>
> >> scott out
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message