falcon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Peeyush Bishnoi (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (FALCON-965) Open up life cycle stage implementation within Falcon for extension
Date Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:41:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14811296#comment-14811296

Peeyush Bishnoi commented on FALCON-965:

[~ajayydv] Thanks for working on this. I have put my comments for the patch on review board.

> Open up life cycle stage implementation within Falcon for extension
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: FALCON-965
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-965
>             Project: Falcon
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 0.7
>            Reporter: Srikanth Sundarrajan
>            Assignee: Ajay Yadava
>              Labels: recipes
>             Fix For: 0.8
>         Attachments: FALCON-965.patch, FalconLifecycle-Designdoc.pdf, xsd.patch
> As it stands Falcon supports replication, generation and eviction lifecycle stages and
plans to support more. This however assumes a certain way of implementing a life cycle function
and changes to these implementation aren't easy, as they are not open for easy extension.
This proposed feature is open this up in Falcon.
> Here is a proposal on how things can possibly be:
> * List of life cycles that Falcon supports would be well known and not extensible
> * Dependency between life cycles are coded up in the falcon server and not necessarily
extensible. (In short adding a new life cycle still requires changes in Falcon)
> * Each Lifecycle in falcon advertises an implementation interface and minimum configuration
interface (for ex. Eviction should expose a way to retrieve the configured time limit for
which data will be available for other life cycle stages to validate. There is no point in
having a process consume last 24 instances of a feed, when the retention will retain only
4 instances)
> * Similar to FALCON-634, life cycle implementation can be dropped in as long as the implementation
interface and configuraion interfaces are adhered to.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message