flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (FLINK-8459) Implement cancelWithSavepoint in RestClusterClient
Date Fri, 02 Mar 2018 14:27:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16383628#comment-16383628

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8459:

Github user GJL commented on the issue:

    @yanghua Thanks for your contribution but I am afraid to tell you that we have changed
our mind and decided that it is better not to allow checkpoints between the savepoint and
job cancelation.
    #5622 already implements this.
    cc: @tillrohrmann 

> Implement cancelWithSavepoint in RestClusterClient
> --------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: FLINK-8459
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8459
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Client
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Gary Yao
>            Assignee: Gary Yao
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: flip-6
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
> Implement the method
>         {{RestClusterClient#cancelWithSavepoint(JobID jobId, @Nullable String
> by either taking a savepoint and cancel the job separately, or by migrating the logic
in {{JobCancellationWithSavepointHandlers}}. The former will have different semantics because
the checkpoint scheduler is not stopped. Thus it is not guaranteed that there won't be additional
checkpoints between the savepoint and the job cancelation.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message