flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (FLINK-10553) Unified sink and source table name in SQL statement
Date Mon, 15 Oct 2018 21:32:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16650824#comment-16650824
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10553:
----------------------------------------

xuefuz commented on issue #6847: [FLINK-10553] [sql] Unified sink and source table name in
SQL statement
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6847#issuecomment-430020997
 
 
   Hi Jerry,
   
   Thanks for fixing this. Your changes seems good. However, I have a side question: do we
expect that the external catalog understands the notation of "catalog.db.table", that's is,
three level hierarchy, or it just take the table name literally. From InMemoryExternalCatalog,
it seems to me the catalog doesn't seem doing anything interpretation on the given table name.
I'm not sure if I missed anything. (Nothing wrong about your changes, but just about my understanding.)
   
   Thanks,
   Xuefu

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


> Unified sink and source table name in SQL statement
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-10553
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10553
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Table API &amp; SQL
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.0, 1.7.0
>            Reporter: wangsan
>            Assignee: wangsan
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Since sink table can now be registered using ExternalCatalog, just the same as source
table, the source and sink name in SQL statement should also be treated equally. Now we can
only use `catalog.database.table` for sink table (enclosed in back-ticks as a identifier),
this is not consistent with source table name (do not treat the whole name as a identifier).

> *INSERT INTO catalog.database.sinktable SELECT ... FROM catalog.database.sourcetable*
should be supported .



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message