flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From GitBox <...@apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] [flink] sunhaibotb commented on a change in pull request #8124: [FLINK-11877] Implement the runtime handling of the InputSelectable interface
Date Tue, 16 Apr 2019 02:03:26 GMT
sunhaibotb commented on a change in pull request #8124: [FLINK-11877] Implement the runtime
handling of the InputSelectable interface
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/8124#discussion_r275606159
 
 

 ##########
 File path: flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/runtime/io/StreamTwoInputSelectableProcessor.java
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,433 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io;
+
+import org.apache.flink.annotation.Internal;
+import org.apache.flink.annotation.VisibleForTesting;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.typeutils.TypeSerializer;
+import org.apache.flink.metrics.Counter;
+import org.apache.flink.metrics.SimpleCounter;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.io.disk.iomanager.IOManager;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.consumer.InputGate;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.metrics.groups.OperatorMetricGroup;
+import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.InputSelectable;
+import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.InputSelection;
+import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.TwoInputStreamOperator;
+import org.apache.flink.streaming.api.watermark.Watermark;
+import org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.metrics.WatermarkGauge;
+import org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.streamrecord.StreamElement;
+import org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.streamrecord.StreamRecord;
+import org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.streamstatus.StreamStatus;
+import org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.streamstatus.StreamStatusMaintainer;
+
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
+
+import java.io.IOException;
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.Collection;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture;
+import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
+import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
+
+import static org.apache.flink.util.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
+import static org.apache.flink.util.Preconditions.checkState;
+
+/**
+ * Input reader for {@link org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.TwoInputSelectableStreamTask}
+ * in the case that the operator is InputSelectable.
+ *
+ * @param <IN1> The type of the records that arrive on the first input
+ * @param <IN2> The type of the records that arrive on the second input
+ */
+@Internal
+public class StreamTwoInputSelectableProcessor<IN1, IN2> {
+
+	private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(StreamTwoInputSelectableProcessor.class);
+
+	private volatile boolean continuousProcessing = true;
 
 Review comment:
   > My point is that keeping those two loops working both of them on while (continuousProcessing)
condition doesn't make sense. One of them should be removed.
   
   I prefer to keep the internal loop because it is more JIT-friendly, and we do not need
to worry about how to make that `processInput()` is inline-optimized.
   
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Mime
View raw message