From issues-return-229300-apmail-flink-issues-archive=flink.apache.org@flink.apache.org Tue Apr 30 12:40:50 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flink-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flink-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01C6118A2A for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41476 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2019 12:40:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flink-issues-archive@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 41450 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2019 12:40:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 41403 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2019 12:40:49 -0000 Received: from ec2-52-202-80-70.compute-1.amazonaws.com (HELO gitbox.apache.org) (52.202.80.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:40:49 +0000 From: GitBox To: issues@flink.apache.org Subject: [GitHub] [flink] flinkbot commented on issue #8321: [FLINK-12351][DataStream] Fix AsyncWaitOperator to deep copy StreamElement when object reuse is enabled Message-ID: <155662804552.16611.8638797882351085462.gitbox@gitbox.apache.org> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:40:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit flinkbot commented on issue #8321: [FLINK-12351][DataStream] Fix AsyncWaitOperator to deep copy StreamElement when object reuse is enabled URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/8321#issuecomment-487935686 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process.
The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: users@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services