flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From GitBox <...@apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] [flink] TisonKun commented on issue #10185: [FLINK-14762][client] Implement ClusterClientJobClientAdapter
Date Mon, 18 Nov 2019 06:30:32 GMT
TisonKun commented on issue #10185: [FLINK-14762][client] Implement ClusterClientJobClientAdapter
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/10185#issuecomment-554872452
   @aljoscha it sounds a bit weird to me. If we move `JobClient` interface to `flink-core`
and remains the implementation in `flink-client`, what for `ClusterClient`? Besides, the name
of `flink-client` means clients implementation but without their interfaces...
   Previously I'm thinking of letting `flink-runtime` depends on `flink-client` so that we
can test job submission/management via clients instead of exposing similar methods in `MiniCluster`
for hacking so. What if we keep client interface in `flink-client` and move the implementation
in `flink-runtime`?
   Any way we put the interface in module A and the implementation in module B which depends
on module A, we have to introduce a dynamic discovery/loading mechanism, shall we?

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:

With regards,
Apache Git Services

View raw message