freemarker-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Dekany <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating
Date Thu, 07 Jan 2016 20:16:45 GMT
Never mind, I have figured it out... "mvn release:prepare" removes the
"-SNAPHOST" from the version, hence the documentation at ASF doesn't
mention that such thing has happened after you have done the SNAPSHOT
deployment. (A bit confusing IMO.)

Thursday, January 7, 2016, 6:03:02 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:

> I have fixed the noticed legal and packaging things (no actual change
> in FreeMarker itself since the last vote), and almost called a new
> voting, but I have some Maven doubts. I can deploy into the staging
> repo, but I didn't dare to Close the staging repo because this I don't
> understand in
> "the project you want to stage must be a SNAPSHOT version". But if
> it's 2.3.24-rc01-incubating-SNAPSHOT (as opposed to just
> 2.3.24-rc01-incubating, which it is now), and the vote passes, then I
> had to build and Maven-deploy a different artifact that's not a
> SNAPSHOT and wasn't voted on. I don't think that's the intent. So, if
> I just Close the staging repo, I would think that it doesn't go
> anywhere "too public", not even if it's non-SNAPSHOT, only if I also
> "Promote" it. But I don't know. So what artifact version should I use?
> Otherwise, here's the new version - anybody spots something wrong with
> it before the next voting?
> 2.3-gae commit hash: b968ffaf2b52225e57ec196aaa3ee7345fa0024d
> 2.3 commit hash: 9a4f598888c1eec85a0d7b9afb400626ec49f46e
> Thursday, January 7, 2016, 5:18:20 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Daniel Dekany <> wrote:
>>> > You'll need to to push the release to Maven central, so it's better to
>>> have
>>> > it as soon as possible. I already requested it to INFRA, see
>>> >
>>> Sorry if I was misunderstandable. I did that days ago, and in
>>> principle we have it already.
>> OK, so I close that issue. No problem, thanks.

 Daniel Dekany

View raw message