From dev-return-410-apmail-freemarker-dev-archive=freemarker.apache.org@freemarker.incubator.apache.org Thu Jan 14 19:43:13 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-freemarker-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-freemarker-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5489518FE5 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61998 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2016 19:43:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-freemarker-dev-archive@freemarker.apache.org Received: (qmail 61959 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2016 19:43:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@freemarker.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 61948 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2016 19:43:13 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:43:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9B0051A08E8 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:43:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.447 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.447 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.554, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A-GN3e3z9-vG for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with SMTP id CEC7B20506 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61917 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2016 19:43:04 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:43:04 +0000 Received: from mail-lf0-f42.google.com (mail-lf0-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 1DBDC1A0040 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f42.google.com with SMTP id h129so74680934lfh.3 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:43:04 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkDzrAOplwiVAXk4YPbUZQJzlpU5JJAR5VRY7YximNhF/1405w3nNWPNBCn09ToCOu5+71dJb8tvUGjSx0S1y4yc0JSQiBRabfyKD0o0Fc4qbjGtug= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.159.9 with SMTP id i9mr1710987lfe.109.1452800582697; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:43:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.64.103 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:43:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.64.103 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:43:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <684471264.20160114194707@freemail.hu> References: <1577635506.20160107222932@freemail.hu> <1697058823.20160110201528@freemail.hu> <1416317931.20160111202859@freemail.hu> <684471264.20160114194707@freemail.hu> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:43:02 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating, attempt 2 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Sergio_Fern=C3=A1ndez?= To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org, Daniel Dekany Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11411980a968680529507e14 --001a11411980a968680529507e14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Please Daniel, you should always send an email with subject "[CANCEL][VOTE] Release ..." to notice the formal cancelation of a vote. On Jan 14, 2016 7:47 PM, "Daniel Dekany" wrote: > Thanks, and note that I did an "attempt 3" yesterday. It's only legal > changes so no re-testing with OFBiz needed. > > > Thursday, January 14, 2016, 9:18:43 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I have also tested the new version with OFBiz trunk and it works fine. > > > > Jacopo > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Daniel Dekany > wrote: > > > >> All right then, and thanks for the feedback! > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks, > >> Daniel Dekany > >> > >> > >> Monday, January 11, 2016, 9:02:17 AM, Kleine, Moritz wrote: > >> > >> > Hi all, CoreMedia has tested RC01 and is happy with it. > >> > Regards, > >> > Moritz > >> > > >> > On 1/10/16, 8:15 PM, "Daniel Dekany" wrote: > >> > > >> >>The finishing of 2.3.24 is now goes on on the > >> >>"2.3.24-gae-stabilization" branch. Meanwhile, the development of > >> >>2.3.25 has been started on the "2.3-gae" branch. > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > > --001a11411980a968680529507e14--