freemarker-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Woonsan Ko <>
Subject Re: [FM3] Opinions about the package structure?
Date Thu, 02 Mar 2017 17:41:35 GMT
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Daniel Dekany <> wrote:
> You can see the current FM3 package structure here:
> Some explanation follows.
> As it was discussed earlier, FM2 freemarker.core and FM2
> freemarker.template were united under org.apache.freemarker.core, and
> then to decrease the size of the resulting package, I have moved out
> the aspects that don't depend on core internals into their own
> subpackages (model, templateresolver, outputformat, etc.). So we have
> ended up with a org.apache.freemarker.core that is actually
> substantially smaller than FM2 freemarker.core was, also it has
> smaller and more focused public API than FM2 freemarker.template has.
> The name directly after org.apache.freemarker denotes the module. So
> you can see 3 modules from the current package structure: core, dom,
> and servlet (which will be freemarker-core.jar, freemarker-dom.jar,
> etc., after we have converted to multi module project, but we haven't
> yet). There will be more actually, like "test" for common JUnit test
> utilities (not a published API), and core-java8 for Java 8 support,
> and who know what else.
> Any opinions/insights?

Looks good to me! Thanks!


> --
> Thanks,
>  Daniel Dekany

View raw message