geronimo-xbean-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 3.5 - rc2
Date Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:26:13 GMT
+1

Jacek

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I uploaded a second distribution of XBean 3.5 which should include the
> NOTICE/LICENSE files in all the appropriate places (I hope).  The same
> changes are present in this candidate that were present in the last one:
>   * SocketAddress factory example for Alex [1]
>   * XBEAN-111 Only register Converters with the VM when requested [2]
>   * Make dependencies optional [3]
>   * XBEAN-114 generify xbean-naming [4]
>   * XBEAN-115 Fix rebind of entry added using deepBind [5]
>   * XBEAN-115 similar fix to for WritableContext for consistency [6]
>   * try to follow apache policy and not deploy timestamped snapshots [7]
>   * Fix classloader name when throwing a CNFE [8]
>   * Let the tests pass on non-MacOS OSes [9]
>   * XBEAN-120 Search for semi-annotated classes in inheritance tree (as if
> @Inherited's applied) [10]
>   * XBEAN-120 Search for semi-annotated classes in inheritance tree (as if
> @Inherited's applied) [11]
>   * update copyright years to include 2009 [12]
>   * add a siteId property to assist in release [13]
>
> Please help validate this release.  I'm a little concerned about
> xbean-spring as I noticed some errors fly by during the release process but
> everything eventually passed successfully.  I'll start validating this in a
> Geronimo server image but at the moment it will only utilize xbean-naming
> 3.5.
>
> The staging repository is available at
>    http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/xbean/
> and the tag is available at
>    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.5/
>
> I've run the rat tool to validate license headers.
>
> Please review and vote:
>   [ ] +1 Release XBean 3.5
>   [ ] -1 Do not, because ...
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours or longer as necessary to validate the
> images and get sufficient participation in the vote.
>
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=689356
> [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=703580
> [3] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=705314
> [4] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=707161
> [5] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=707227
> [6] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=707230
> [7] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=707719
> [8] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=725706
> [9] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=729545
> [10] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=729546
> [11] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=731945
> [12] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=737042
> [13] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=737184
>
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>



-- 
Jacek Laskowski
Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

Mime
View raw message