giraph-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Avery Ching (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-328) Outgoing messages from current superstep should be grouped at the sender by owning worker, not by partition
Date Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:00:09 GMT


Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-328:

This is a great stuff Eli.  I'm really happy that you undertook this. =)

I also like the change of getPartitionId to getTaskId for less confusion with Giraph partitions. - Can we separate this into 2 lines?  I'm also confused on whether
this appears to be correct (given that USE_WORKERINFO_ADDRESS is final int)

Last, but most important, it would be great to preserve the notion of partitions in the message
and the request (i.e. 

private Map<WorkerInfo, Map<Integer, Map<I, Collection<M>>>> messageCache

It is a bit more complex, but on the request processing side, it allows us the ability to
not have to look up the partitions when adding the messages to them.  In my work on GIRAPH-329,
I find that this improves performance quite a bit and we are limited by our ability to add
messages to that map on the receiver.

Otherwise, this looks good.
> Outgoing messages from current superstep should be grouped at the sender by owning worker,
not by partition
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: GIRAPH-328
>                 URL:
>             Project: Giraph
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: bsp, graph
>    Affects Versions: 0.2.0
>            Reporter: Eli Reisman
>            Assignee: Eli Reisman
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.2.0
>         Attachments: GIRAPH-328-1.patch, GIRAPH-328-2.patch, GIRAPH-328-3.patch
> Currently, outgoing messages created by the Vertex#compute() cycle on each worker are
stored and grouped by the partitionId on the destination worker to which the messages belong.
This results in messages being duplicated on the wire per partition on a given receiving worker
that has delivery vertices for those messages.
> By partitioning the outgoing, current-superstep messages by destination worker, we can
split them into partitions at insertion into a MessageStore on the destination worker. What
we trade in come compute time while inserting at the receiver side, we gain in fine grained
control over the real number of messages each worker caches outbound for any given worker
before flushing, and how those flush messages are aggregated for delivery as well. Potentially,
it allows for a great reduction in duplicate messages sent in situations like Vertex#sendMessageToAllEdges()
-- see GIRAPH-322, GIRAPH-314. You get the idea.
> This might be a poor idea, and it can certainly use some additional refinement, but it
passes mvn verify and may even run ;) It interoperates with the disk spill code, but not as
well as it could. Consider this a request for comment on the idea (and the approach) rather
than a finished product.
> Comments/ideas/help welcome! Thanks

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message