giraph-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Charith Wickramarachchi <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Giraph 1.1.0 RC2
Date Sat, 15 Nov 2014 01:04:54 GMT
I was thinking more from a functionality point of view.  And I think it is
a must fix bug.  As you pointed out, this is an old issue and seems like It
was ignored for a long time.

I found that one work around is to use giraph.useSuperstepCounters=false
option.  So I am fine with that.


On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <>

> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Charith Wickramarachchi
> <> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is fixed in this
> version? Or
> > is there a work around.
> > I think it is a blocker.
> I honestly can't see how an issue that is that old could be a blocker.
> Thanks,
> Roman.

Charith Dhanushka Wickramaarachchi

Tel  +1 213 447 4253
Twitter  @charithwiki <>

This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information
and is intended exclusively for the addressee/s. If you are not the
intended recipient/s, or believe that you may have
received this communication in error, please reply to the sender indicating
that fact and delete the copy you received and in addition, you should not
print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information
contained in this communication. Internet communications cannot be
guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not
accept liability for any errors or omissions

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message