gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <>
Subject Re: moof:gump/public and moof:gump/test
Date Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:42:44 GMT
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:

> I think we need a test install on moof, to match the public install. Heck,
> maybe we need a few tests. Here are my thoughts:
> 1) We have a unit test workspace that uses the unit test workspace, and runs
> itself, and perhaps even the unit test script. This ought be blindingly
> fast, since there are no contents in CVS|SVN for the  projects, so they
> randomly fail. That said, it does a semi-reasonable code path coverage.
> 2) Better (and more work, or could be the same) we add more to a test set of
> projects, perhaps in SVN (like we have gump-test-maven[12]) that have
> content, but it is minimal. Again fast, and better 'cos it is more coverage.
> Thoughts?
> BTW: We could (until SVN is fixed) have a separate user id for each of
> these.

what about gump user id for the time being?


View raw message