hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5073) Hadoop 1.0 Interface Classification - scope (visibility - public/private) and stability
Date Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:20:57 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12751119#action_12751119

Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-5073:

> Another approach to take is to have nested interface as follows ...
This is very creative.  However, it does not seem that the nested annotation is designed for
this purpose.

In java.lang.annotation, this is an [@Retention|http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/lang/annotation/Retention.html]
annotation, which is very similar to our @Audience annotation.  @Retention is declared with
a RetentionPolicy value, where RetentionPolicy is an enum.  We should do the same.

> Hadoop 1.0 Interface Classification - scope (visibility - public/private) and stability
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HADOOP-5073
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5073
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Sanjay Radia
>            Assignee: Sanjay Radia
>         Attachments: 5073_demo.png, c5073_20090825.patch, c5073_20090825.png, HADOOP-5073.patch
> This jira proposes an interface classification for hadoop interfaces.
> The discussion was started in email alias core-dev@hadoop.apache.org in Nov 2008.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message