hadoop-common-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-9991) Fix up Hadoop Poms for enforced dependencies, roll up JARs to latest versions
Date Thu, 14 Nov 2013 01:04:17 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13822050#comment-13822050

stack commented on HADOOP-9991:

[~stevel@apache.org] Thanks for taking on this masochistic task.  Given hadoop surface area,
it is hard to figure if a dependency is needed.  How about we go radical in trunk since it
will be ten years before there is a hadoop3 which should be time enough to figure those dependencies
removed that should have been left in.  hadoop2 could do w/ a just a purge of at least the
just-not-used.  I'd like to help out.  In hbase we put on a few filters to try and block the
plain farcical but god-bless-maven, you have to reproduce this set each time for each hadoop
version we build against since no xinclude... 

> Fix up Hadoop Poms for enforced dependencies, roll up JARs to latest versions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HADOOP-9991
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9991
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: build
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.0, 2.1.1-beta
>            Reporter: Steve Loughran
>         Attachments: hadoop-9991-v1.txt
> If you try using Hadoop downstream with a classpath shared with HBase and Accumulo, you
soon discover how messy the dependencies are.
> Hadoop's side of this problem is
> # not being up to date with some of the external releases of common JARs
> # not locking down/excluding inconsistent versions of artifacts provided down the dependency

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message