hadoop-mapreduce-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ye Zhou <zhouye...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.4 (RC0)
Date Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:23 GMT
Hi, Konstantin.
Thanks for leading the release.

+1 (non-binding)

-Built from the source on mac with jdk_1.8.0_40
-Built on internal Jenkins with jdk_1.8.0_40.
-Deployed on a cluster with 121 nodes(Including RM, NM, NN, DN)
-Basic shell commands
-Distcp 3.7TB data to HDFS
-Run GridMix test which submitted 15K MR jobs in 5 hours(trace generated
from real production job trace)

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko <shv.hadoop@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Uploaded new binaries hadoop-2.7.4-RC0.tar.gz, which adds lib/native/.
> Same place: http://home.apache.org/~shv/hadoop-2.7.4-RC0/
>
> Thanks,
> --Konstantin
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Chris Douglas <cdouglas@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Konstantin Shvachko
> > <shv.hadoop@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > For the packaging, here is the exact phrasing from the sited
> > release-policy
> > > document relevant to binaries:
> > > "As a convenience to users that might not have the appropriate tools to
> > > build a compiled version of the source, binary/bytecode packages MAY be
> > > distributed alongside official Apache releases. In all such cases, the
> > > binary/bytecode package MUST have the same version number as the source
> > > release and MUST only add binary/bytecode files that are the result of
> > > compiling that version of the source code release and its
> dependencies."
> > > I don't think my binary package violates any of these.
> >
> > +1 The PMC VOTE applies to source code, only. If someone wants to
> > rebuild the binary tarball with native libs and replace this one,
> > that's fine.
> >
> > My reading of the above is that source code must be distributed with
> > binaries, not that we omit the source code from binary releases... -C
> >
> > > But I'll upload an additional tar.gz with native bits and no src, as
> you
> > > guys requested.
> > > Will keep it as RC0 as there is no source code change and it comes from
> > the
> > > same build.
> > > Hope this is satisfactory.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --Konstantin
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Wang <andrew.wang@cloudera.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I agree with Brahma on the two issues flagged (having src in the
> binary
> > >> tarball, missing native libs). These are regressions from prior
> > releases.
> > >>
> > >> As an aside, "we release binaries as a convenience" doesn't relax the
> > >> quality bar. The binaries are linked on our website and distributed
> > through
> > >> official Apache channels. They have to adhere to Apache release
> > >> requirements. And, most users consume our work via Maven dependencies,
> > >> which are binary artifacts.
> > >>
> > >> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html goes into this in
> more
> > >> detail. A release must minimally include source packages, and can also
> > >> include binary artifacts.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Andrew
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Konstantin Shvachko <
> > >> shv.hadoop@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> To avoid any confusion in this regard. I built RC0 manually in
> > compliance
> > >>> with Apache release policy
> > >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
> > >>> I edited the HowToReleasePreDSBCR page to make sure people don't use
> > >>> Jenkins option for building.
> > >>>
> > >>> A side note. This particular build is broken anyways, so no worries
> > there.
> > >>> I think though it would be useful to have it working for testing and
> > as a
> > >>> packaging standard.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> --Konstantin
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Allen Wittenauer <
> > >>> aw@effectivemachines.com
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > On Jul 31, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Konstantin Shvachko <
> > >>> shv.hadoop@gmail.com>
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToReleasePreDSBCR
> > >>> >
> > >>> >         FYI:
> > >>> >
> > >>> >                 If you are using ASF Jenkins to create an ASF
> release
> > >>> > artifact, it's pretty much an automatic vote failure as any such
> > >>> release is
> > >>> > in violation of ASF policy.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>



-- 

*Zhou, Ye  **周晔*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message