Hello there,

I've seen that you resolved the HAMA-789.  So, is it going to be 
available in a new version? How do we define the specific port we want?



Στις 6/2/2014 1:07 μμ, ο/η Edward J. Yoon έγραψε:
> I'll fix soon.
>
> I'm reopen https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-789
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Ηλίας Καπουράνης <ikapoura@csd.auth.gr> wrote:
>> Another error came up! Now it starts zookeepers but loses the connection.
>> Specifically:
>>
>> attempt_201402061212_0001_000004_0: 14/02/06 12:12:58 INFO ipc.Server:
>> Starting Socket Reader #1 for port 49564
>> attempt_201402061212_0001_000004_0: 14/02/06 12:12:58 INFO ipc.Server: IPC
>> Server Responder: starting
>> attempt_201402061212_0001_000004_0: 14/02/06 12:12:58 INFO ipc.Server: IPC
>> Server listener on 49564: starting
>> attempt_201402061212_0001_000004_0: 14/02/06 12:12:58 INFO
>> message.HadoopMessageManagerImpl:  BSPPeer address:host port:49564
>> attempt_201402061212_0001_000004_0: 14/02/06 12:12:58 INFO ipc.Server: IPC
>> Server handler 0 on 49564: starting
>> attempt_201402061212_0001_000004_0: 14/02/06 12:12:59 INFO
>> sync.ZKSyncClient: Initializing ZK Sync Client
>> attempt_201402061212_0001_000004_0: 14/02/06 12:12:59 INFO
>> sync.ZooKeeperSyncClientImpl: Start connecting to Zookeeper! At
>> host/address:49564
>> attempt_201402061212_0001_000004_0: 14/02/06 12:12:59 ERROR
>> sync.ZooKeeperSyncClientImpl:
>> org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperException$ConnectionLossException:
>> KeeperErrorCode = ConnectionLoss for /bsp/job_201402061212_0001/peers
>> attempt_201402061212_0001_000004_0: 14/02/06 12:13:02 ERROR
>> sync.ZKSyncClient: Error checking zk path
>> /bsp/job_201402061212_0001/peers/host:49564
>> attempt_201402061212_0001_000004_0:
>> org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperException$ConnectionLossException:
>> KeeperErrorCode = ConnectionLoss for
>> /bsp/job_201402061212_0001/peers/host:49564
>>
>>
>> So I think that the problem again is the port restriction. The 49564 port is
>> randomly selected again. I tried seting it at the zookeeper quorum servers
>> like host:port1:port2 but still it chooses randomly. Is there any way to
>> "standarize" it like with groomserver?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Στις 6/2/2014 10:24 πμ, ο/η Ηλίας Καπουράνης έγραψε:
>>
>>> Thanks a lot Edward! I will try it and let you know if something comes up!
>>>
>>> Have a nice day!
>>>
>>>
>>> Στις 6/2/2014 7:15 πμ, ο/η Edward J. Yoon έγραψε:
>>>> Again,
>>>>
>>>> You can specify the report server port by setting
>>>> "bsp.groom.report.address" property like below:
>>>>
>>>> <property>
>>>> <name>bsp.groom.report.address</name>
>>>> <value>127.0.0.1:5001</value>
>>>> </property>
>>>>
>>>> Default value was 127.0.0.1:0. (random port).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Oh, .. thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> The GroomServer.taskReportServer seems uses random port. I'll make it
>>>>> configurable.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Ηλίας Καπουράνης <ikapoura@csd.auth.gr>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what the IPC Server stands for and it gets random ports? I ve seen
>>>>>> 39865
>>>>>> and 52765. What is the deal with it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Στις 5/2/2014 2:53 μμ, ο/η Edward J. Yoon έγραψε:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a Hama cluster uses ports "bsp.master.port" 40000 and
>>>>>>> "bsp.groom.rpc.port" 50000 to communicate among the cluster nodes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And the default peer port is 61000. If you set 3 for the maximum
>>>>>>> number of tasks per node, each task uses ports from 61000 to 61003 to
>>>>>>> transfer messages between bsp tasks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Ηλίας Καπουράνης
>>>>>>> <ikapoura@csd.auth.gr>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello there,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am trying to setup Hama in a cluster with really strict port
>>>>>>>> permissions
>>>>>>>> and I get across the error at every GroomServer:
>>>>>>>> "There is a problem in establishing link with BSPMaster."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Do you know what is the range of ports that every GroomServers IPC
>>>>>>>> Server
>>>>>>>> gets when started?
>>>>>>>> - Is there a way to limit this range to new user values?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>>>> @eddieyoon
>>>>
>>>>
>
>