hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lei Chang <lei_ch...@apache.org>
Subject Re: First HAWQ release
Date Wed, 22 Jun 2016 06:58:15 GMT
the sync happens automatically. it is already on github i think.

Cheers
Lei



On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Radar Da lei <rlei@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Hi Goden,
>
> I used branch name as '2.0.0-incubating'.
>
> BTW, this branch is at Apache side, does this need to be sync to GITHUB?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Radar
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Ting(Goden) Yao <tyao@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > I don't see a branch named "hawq 2.0.0-incubating" , which name did you
> use
> > for the branch?
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:21 PM Radar Da lei <rlei@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Vineet,
> > >
> > > Quicklz already been removed. I will cut a branch now.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Radar
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Vineet Goel <vvineet@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 to the proposed release name and cutting a release branch asap.
> > > > Sounds like we need to find a good commit point right after the
> Apache
> > > > release requirements were met (quicklz removal etc).
> > > >
> > > > -Vineet
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Ting(Goden) Yao <tyao@pivotal.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I can start the voting process - Also I'd like to change the
> release
> > > name
> > > > > to "2.0.0-incubating" , removing the beta tag given we've passed
> that
> > > > point
> > > > > in the timeline.
> > > > > I also need help to cut a clean release branch as there's been so
> > many
> > > > > commits coming in which is not in the original scope - can anyone
> who
> > > > made
> > > > > the commits help me on that?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Goden
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:37 PM Lei Chang <lei_chang@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > A summary on the JIRAs left:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > HAWQ-783: it needs catalog changes, so I think it is better
to
> put
> > it
> > > > > into
> > > > > > following release and the impact is small.
> > > > > > HAWQ-460: resolved since thrift library is in.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looks we are ready to go for voting if no other issues left
or
> > > > concerns!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > Lei
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Ting(Goden) Yao <
> tyao@pivotal.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I still have concerns that left out HAWQ-783 is not a clean
cut
> > for
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > release.
> > > > > > > Guo - can you shed some light on what's the impact of leaving
> > this
> > > to
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > future?
> > > > > > > I may also go through the previous commits and understand
the
> > > > changes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:26 PM Roman Shaposhnik <
> > > > roman@shaposhnik.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Guo Gang <paulguo@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > HAWQ-783 (Remove quickly in metadata) is a JIRA
for future
> > > work.
> > > > > This
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > for the shortcoming next release. Please remove
the jira
> from
> > > the
> > > > > > > > blocking
> > > > > > > > > lists.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ok, if we're down to HAWQ-460 as the only release
blocker,
> can
> > > > > somebody
> > > > > > > > please
> > > > > > > > provide an update? The last comment on the JIRA was
more
> than a
> > > > month
> > > > > > > ago.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Roman.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message