hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Xiang Sheng <xsh...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: Rename "greenplum" to "hawq"
Date Wed, 13 Jul 2016 01:21:56 GMT
Agree . @xunzhang.
However , some greenplum strings can be easily replaced , but there are too
many in the code or comments.  Changing all of them costs too much efforts.

So changing the strings that users can see is enough.

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Gmail <xunzhangthu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi hawq developers,
> I am a little confused with the greenplum strings(code, file, comment)
> inside hawq code base. Does these codes still rely on upstream gpdb? If
> not, could it possible to rename them with "hawq"?
> Also, if these strings are left, as a developer, sometimes I think that
> the bugs in that forked version of greenplum might also be a issue in
> latest HAWQ. Another uncomfortable experience is that before running HAWQ,
> users should source "greenplum.sh".
> Best
> xunzhang
> Send from my iPhone

Best Regards,
Xiang Sheng

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message