hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From 陶征霖 <ztao1...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache HAWQ Graduation from Incubator
Date Fri, 01 Jun 2018 01:50:53 GMT
+1 to Lei. He is worthy of the title of Apache HAWQ PMC Chairman.

2018-06-01 9:44 GMT+08:00 Yi JIN <yjin@apache.org>:

> +1 to Lei, I fully support Lei Change as Apache HAWQ project PMC Chairman,
> he deserves this role, not only outstanding contributions to this project
> in a very long period till today also his solid leadership and vision.
>
> Best,
> Yi  Jin
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:17 AM, Ed Espino <espino@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Ruilong,
> >
> > I also give my full support for Lei Chang as the Apache HAWQ project's
> > initial PMC Chairman. His leadership and vision have contributed
> immensely
> > to the project.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -=e
> >
> > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 6:32 AM, Ruilong Huo <huor@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Great progress towards Apache HAWQ graduation! Thanks Radar for pushing
> > > this forward!
> > >
> > > I would like to nominate Lei Chang as the PMC Chair. He initiated HAWQ
> > > project several years ago, led the development, brought it to Apache
> > > incubation, and has always been active in HAWQ community to make it a
> > > world-leading big data product as well as a successfully Apache
> project.
> > > There is no doubt that he is perfect for the role. And I believe he
> will
> > > continue to share his insights and go even further with HAWQ after
> > > graduation.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Ruilong Huo
> > >
> > >
> > > At 2018-05-31 15:40:42, "Radar Lei" <rlei@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > > >Just find some good material for nominating chair from Roman's email,
> > > >thanks Roman.
> > > >
> > > >I think we can follow this to nominate a Chair in this thread too.
> Guys
> > > >please help to nominate or self-nominate. Thanks a lot.
> > > >
> > > >See:
> > > >At the very minimum your resolution will contain: 1. A name of the
> > project
> > > >2. A list of proposed PMC 3. A proposed PMC chair
> > > >
> > > >On #3 I typically recommend podlings I mento to setup a rotating chair
> > > >policy. This is, in no way, an ASF requirement so feel free to ignore
> > it,
> > > >but it worked well before. The chair will be expected up for rotation
> > > every
> > > >year. It will be more that ok for the same person to self-nominate
> once
> > > the
> > > >year is up -- but at the same time it'll be up to the same person to
> > > >actually kick off a thread asking if anybody else is interested in
> > serving
> > > >as a chair for the next year. Of course, if there multiple candidates
> > > there
> > > >will have to be a vote.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >Radar
> > > >
> > > >On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:05 PM, Radar Lei <rlei@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Thanks Roman.
> > > >>
> > > >> This make sense, I will start to draft the resolution. BTW, we would
> > > need
> > > >> to nominate a chair, I guess it's the last piece we need to draft
> the
> > > >> resolution.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Radar
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <
> > > roman@shaposhnik.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Radar Lei <rlei@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> > > >>> > Hi Roman,
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > We have confirmed with each HAWQ committer whether they want
to
> > > remain
> > > >>> with
> > > >>> > HAWQ project.  As a summary, 37 PPMC members(including two
> mentors)
> > > and
> > > >>> 7
> > > >>> > committers confirmed they want to remain with HAWQ. [1] The
total
> > > >>> committers
> > > >>> > number 44 seems pretty close with PPMC member number 37,
is it
> good
> > > >>> enough
> > > >>> > to make PMC == committers as our graduation resolution?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> PMC == committers in this case makes perfect sense to me!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > Should we update the whimsy and project webpage now or do
update
> > > after
> > > >>> graduation?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> It really doesn't matter much. Your next step is to draft a
> > resolution
> > > >>> similar to:
> > > >>>     https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/ms
> > > >>> g56982.html
> > > >>>
> > > >>> and start a [DISCUSS] thread similar to the above.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Makes sense?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Roman.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message