hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Qian, Ling" <larryq...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re: Which is better ICE or thrift
Date Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:25:52 GMT

  Thanks for explanation. By mature, I mean ICE supports more languages and sounds like have
been used to more application.


Qian, Ling 

发件人: Jean-Daniel Cryans 
发送时间: 2008-10-29  23:22:09 
收件人: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org 
主题: Re: Which is better ICE or thrift 
 I don't think that Thrift is really that immature, I haven't seen many bugs
in it. But also reimplementing another interface would be some hard work and
would have to be supported. So Thrift should be your better option.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Qian, Ling <larryqian@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>  If I'd like to develop HBase application in other languages (not Java),
> which package is better choice, ICE or Thrift? ICE seems more mature, but
> ICE does not have any interface design with HBase, while thrift is
> light-weighted but not as mature.
>  Thanks!
> 2008-10-29
> Qian, Ling
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message