hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: how to get hbase 0.92.0 or any other version could work with hadoop 0.21.0
Date Fri, 01 Jul 2011 05:00:19 GMT
>From the issue mentioned by Andy: '..we do not work against hadoop
0.21, not w/o backport of "HADOOP-7351 Regression:
HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could
supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461"
and "HDFS-1948 Forward port 'hdfs-1520 lightweight namenode operation
to trigger lease recovery''

HAADOOP-6461 and HDFS-1948 are in 0.22 branch and on hadoop trunk.

P.S I did but basic cluster testing running loadings over night on
whatever the state of 0.22 hadoop was at the time of hbase-2233
commit.  More testing to do before we release 0.92 (TRUNK was
unbuildable at the time so I did not test it).

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
> HBase trunk will be 0.92.0 when released.
> HBASE-2233 (Support both Hadoop 0.20 and 0.22) went into trunk on June 9th. I have not
personally tried it, though.
> Best regards,
>    - Andy
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Dan Fan <dan.fan@webex.com>
>> To: user@hbase.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 4:23 PM
>> Subject: how to get hbase 0.92.0 or any other version could work with hadoop 0.21.0
>> Hi,
>> I am working on a research project which used Hadoop 0.21.0, and I want
>> to add HBase on top of that. But it seems there is no a released version
>> of HBase could work with Hadoop 0.21.x. I saw 0.92.0 will support hadoop
>> 0.21.x. But I when I tried to check out the version from SVN, I cannot
>> find the related tag or branch named '0.92.0...'. So could you let me
>> know how to get a copy of 0.92.0? Or any version else could work with
>> Hadoop 0.21.0?  I know it's still in development, but I am ok if the
>> basic functions could work.
>> Thanks,
>> Dan

View raw message