hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Upgrade from cdh3u0 to 0.90.3 + HBASE-3872
Date Sat, 09 Jul 2011 03:58:58 GMT
Yes. You should analyze HBase and hadoop logs
See Stack's comments in HBASE-4058

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Xu-Feng Mao <m9suns@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Ted, I thought the patch to trunk is OK to 0.90 branch.
> So we have to wait for the patch.
>
> Another question, our observation is much like HBASE-3872, we lost the file
> on hdfs, and have a
> hole in the meta. But any other way to confirm this problem? For example,
> can we find some clues
> in the logs?
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Please direct question related to cdh to cdh-dev
>>
>> Patch of HBASE-3872 for 0.90 branch isn't posted yet. Do you have a patch
>> already ?
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Xu-Feng Mao <m9suns@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Since we've run into HBASE-3872 issue, we're considering upgrade a
>> > production system from cdh3u0 to 0.90.3+HBASE-3872 patched.
>> > Is it safe to just replace the hbase directory, and restart all the
>> > regionservers and master? We have no chance to stop the whole cluster
>> > together, can we restarted the regionservers partly, ie., can cdh3u0 and
>> > 0.90.3 cooperate for a while?
>> >
>> > Thanks and regards
>> >
>> > Mao Xu-Feng
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message