hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rayees <mray...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 答复: why not introduce reverse index into hbase for multi-dimensional query
Date Wed, 16 Jul 2014 18:01:01 GMT
Perhaps, this can be of interest for this:
http://www.lilyproject.org/lily/index.html


On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:51 PM, 张景鹏 <zhangjingpeng@jd.com> wrote:

> Sorry ,yes it's Solr
> When I combin hbase with solr ,I find it have a good performance . I store
> the colums which should be query as condition and hbase rowkey in solr and
> all colums stored in hbase . so I think hbase can add the solr's(lucene)
> some index function as hbase two secondary index.
> I recommend you to look at this article which will have a help.
> http://static.druid.io/docs/druid.pdf
>
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com]
> 发送时间: 2014年7月16日 10:58
> 收件人: user@hbase.apache.org
> 主题: Re: why not introduce reverse index into hbase for multi-dimensional
> query
>
> Can you describe reverse index in bit more detail ?
>
> BTW sorl should be solr, right ?
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:42 PM, 张景鹏 <zhangjingpeng@jd.com> wrote:
>
> > why not introduce reverse index into hbase for multi-dimensional query ?
> >  looks like sorl + hbase
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message