hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Date Wed, 06 May 2015 17:43:57 GMT
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I prefer to patch the POMs.
>

Is this a formal -1?

I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed and
I'll spin a new RC tonight.

> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating
> the
> > poms and sinking the RC?
> >
> >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
> >>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
> >>> rarely changes.
> >> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
> dependencies
> >> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
> >> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sean
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message