From user-return-53350-apmail-hbase-user-archive=hbase.apache.org@hbase.apache.org Wed Mar 1 22:24:40 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E896419DE5 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 22:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81110 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2017 22:24:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 81036 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2017 22:24:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 81023 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2017 22:24:38 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 22:24:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 89FDEC028C for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 22:24:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ymFMTCLndVX3 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 22:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com (mail-qk0-f173.google.com [209.85.220.173]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 32C9C5F36B for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 22:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id n127so95275487qkf.0 for ; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:24:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LmVeSD/1buyaiwKeoEj2WFJePpIsmj9z+KPPjPVa8vY=; b=V4yKsEqAAm9/t3/k64of7AKQkbrf4aU61XhWN8eQf7nnOLfERf9Nv9qXSi3Js+X3MJ SgjdP2eo4O0T665HHNsjVKRnZj7br5FcNACPl7K3bNZSRdlPl1CmfvSv7M0/hHLxyeBP Mi6DCyCHq2w4lA7Wfk8oOZwpwJhPfnTVngtWkOkb0XAgBvMcEVWcCf+SWqRMkPFO0T+D SXffa0sif/40dMBlZQzFHH3ecueOjJL5i3ee4IcGuf8QahwDsYXF16DPMsCbsEx3zDBM YbDUvkQ2OVFN8/UcH/cRHn2+e1/Dev10UM7EBvzJrAxUdlPO6d30vYxdcnyZF4aMjbdn NDxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LmVeSD/1buyaiwKeoEj2WFJePpIsmj9z+KPPjPVa8vY=; b=UreVQorekUjdhAtIPc6kOaflnNFRs5yc8TAqSYV5bR8+S42BmAAciw030TNz77H9z5 ckWo0BMVvQhZ0TIFYI5GAeMGi7BDNu+5RbmtGogHhEMyugYvkzOrAx6L04t0zlmH7Xso sW5ydIJ66NTpz3hCMes5/uSNqguEKq5KVZiHSZ/MbpxERtW/EkpwehUz40vniaZ2ysfB 0N6kSvoUiF21mI1iDZIIkwrhYgGnMkNm2P/hM+zkALUkHZi2gEG3uPmwDctfkBo+o1fk 8Ke4TvB8cTWJcgxPsB0nmqN4HViSfoQGWkdDhGNcMDaWxRjpyL4TC05teTzp74h7pSbU Aedw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mg64j0/5qi0EBNt2mEb80fXexTbCdC7Enzn5PmTCL4L9klkp+aoisrTY86FyCU0s9HgZJppJdu8LsPXw== X-Received: by 10.200.55.241 with SMTP id e46mr14043156qtc.200.1488407071946; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:24:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.168.202 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 14:24:31 -0800 (PST) From: =?UTF-8?B?RGFuaWVsIFBvxYJhY3phxYRza2k=?= Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 23:24:31 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: parallel processing of regions in coprocessor To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113e9b12ce04710549b2c671 --001a113e9b12ce04710549b2c671 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, Let's assume that we have cluster consisting from one RegionServer and the RegionsServer contains one table consisting from 3 regions. I would like to process regions in coprocessor parallely. Is it possible? I observed that currenlty it invokes coproprocessor with all the regions one by one. So it process at the beginig region1, when finished process regions2 and ... Is it possible to change this behaviour? Regards --001a113e9b12ce04710549b2c671--