httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zac Stevens <>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] OT Answering mail--without causing pain
Date Mon, 02 Dec 2002 15:11:34 GMT
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:47:02AM -0500, Kyle wrote:
> I object to the idiocy of 2.3 from the site you mentioned.  I have over 
> 600 e-mails to go through today.  I don't have time to scroll down to 
> the bottom of every one of them to see the replies.  Replies should 
> ALWAYS be at the top so they are seen when you step through your mails.

I don't think it's fair to decry that point as 'idiocy' - on the contrary,
it's a logical, thought-out position.  While you do have a good point in
favour of top-posting, you don't do yourself any favours by namecalling.
That having been said, on the balance of things I don't think it's a
compelling argument for top posting.

If you find yourself needing to scroll through a lot of text to find
responses, this is probably indicative of poor quoting on the part of the
respondant.  Or you are looking at a response to a particularly long
message and the replies are inline with the quoted text.  Two wrongs don't 
make a right here - top posting 'fixes' one problem with a different 

At the end of the day, no-one is forcing you to peruse the entire text of
each of the 600 messages you receieve.  Personally, I tend to favour
reading the last few additions to a given thread and rely on good quoting
to provide context.  If it seems necessary after that, I may choose to go
back and read the thread in its entirety.

In my experience, top-posting is a hindrance to discussion.  While it
doesn't cause major problems in the first reply, it's all downhill from

Just my (not-so-) humble opinion,


The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
   "   from the digest:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message