httpd-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [users@httpd] Any Comparisons? -- mod_wl vs mod_proxy vs mod_jk
Date Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:01:33 GMT
You could always try mod_proxy_ajp, which uses the mod_proxy framework,
but communicates via AJP. It's better at detection of silently
dropped AJP connections.

> On Feb 9, 2015, at 3:18 AM, Dr James Smith <js5@sanger.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> We used mod_jk for ages and have recently flipped back to mod_proxy for our java/tomcat
apps, we found that we had connectivity issues with mod_jk - if the connection between apache/tomcat
is severed then mod_jk did not always work cleanly - and subsequent requests would just hang.
mod_proxy didn't have the problem.
> 
> The problem showed it self when we started segregating machines into virtual firewall
zones - so traffic between machines was controlled.
> 
> It does mean that we don't have as easy a load-balanced setup  - although we do send
the requests back through our front-end load balancers and this seems effective.
> 
> James
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity
registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number
2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE. 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message