ibatis-user-cs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Clough, Samuel \(USPC.PRG.Atlanta\)" <Samuel_Clo...@princetonrg.com>
Subject RE: Return Results
Date Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:18:04 GMT
There has to be something else to it though.  iBatis just passes through DML and parses what
comes back.  The driver or SQL has to be doing something that iBatis is interpreting.  A stored
proc should just be another piece of DML to iBatis.  It shouldn’t know or respond to anything
that’s happening in a proc. 


Of course, I would argue that the SQL there should just be in the iBatis file rather than
wrapped in a proc, but I know there are different camps.


From: Lee Shinlever [mailto:lshinlever@lexesinc.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:00 PM
To: user-cs@ibatis.apache.org
Subject: RE: Return Results


It is the oddest thing. We actually modified the SPROC by removing the RETURN statement and
just allowing the results of the SELECT to come back to iBatis. It wasn't until we remove
the SELECT  @DateActive = DATEADD(minute,  -(@MinutesSinceLastInActive), @CurrentTimeUtc)
line, did that calculation in our application code and passed it in as a parameter that it
finally worked. 

For some reason iBatis just did not like that calculation being run inside the SPROC.


On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:55 -0400, Clough, Samuel (USPC.PRG.Atlanta) wrote: 

Maybe I don’t understand this correctly, but are you trying to use SQL Server’s ability
to generate a result set from a stored proc call?  If you, I would say you should probably
use a select element rather than a statement element so that iBatis expects a result set.
 Otherwise, iBatis is probably expecting to return you the procedures return code or maybe
the rows modified return from the database, I’m not sure.


	From: Lee Shinlever [mailto:lshinlever@lexesinc.com] 
	Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 4:27 PM
	To: user-cs@ibatis.apache.org
	Subject: Return Results

	Currently we are replacing all of the data access code in the ASP.Net Security Providers
using Spring.Net and iBatis.Net. Basically instead of implementing a custom provider each
time security persistence needs changed we just use one provider and change its data access
component (iBatisNet) as needed. 
	We did run into one operation that just won't return the expected results no matter what
we do short of modifying the actual stored procedure. We don't have a problem changing the
SPROC to make it work but we were wondering if anyone could point out what might be happening
	    1) SQL Server 2005
	     2) Visual Studio 2005
	     3) iBatisNet DataMapper
	Original Stored Procedure:
	ALTER PROCEDURE dbo.aspnet_Membership_GetNumberOfUsersOnline
	    @ApplicationName            nvarchar(256),
	    @MinutesSinceLastInActive   int,
	    @CurrentTimeUtc             datetime    
	    DECLARE @DateActive datetime
	    SELECT  @DateActive = DATEADD(minute,  -(@MinutesSinceLastInActive), @CurrentTimeUtc)
	    DECLARE @NumOnLine int
	    SELECT     @NumOnLine = Count(*)
	     FROM         aspnet_Users AS u WITH (NOLOCK) INNER JOIN
	                           aspnet_Applications AS a WITH (NOLOCK) ON u.ApplicationId = a.ApplicationId
	                           aspnet_Membership AS m WITH (NOLOCK) ON u.UserId = m.UserId
	     WHERE     (u.LastActivityDate > @DateActive) AND (a.LoweredApplicationName = LOWER(@ApplicationName))
	   return @NumOnLine
	    <procedure id="GetNumberOfUsersOnline"
	Parameter Map:
	    <parameterMap id="GetNumberOfUsersOnline" class="Hashtable">
	      <parameter property="ApplicationName" column="ApplicationName" dbType="string" size="256"/>
	      <parameter property="MinutesSinceLastInActive" column="MinutesSinceLastInActive"
	      <parameter property="CurrentTimeUtc" column="CurrentTimeUtc" dbType="DateTime"/>
	DAO Code:    
	      Hashtable parms = new Hashtable();
	      parms.Add("ApplicationName", applicationname);
	      parms.Add("MinutesSinceLastInactive", minutessincelastinactive);
	      parms.Add("CurrentTimeUtc", currenttimeutc);
	      int results = 0;
	      results = (int) CustomMapper.Instance().QueryForObject("GetNumberOfUsersOnline", parms);
	      return results;
	    Using the same parameters, expected results = 2 ...
	    1) Removed the return @NumOnLine line
	    1) Ran the SPROC in the SQL debugger - SQL output results were fine
	    2) Ran the original DAO code using SQL command objects - SQL command results were fine
	    3) Ran our DAO code using iBatisNet - no results ever return
	    4) Change mapping file and DAO code to reflect using a Hashtable as the return class
- iBatisNet did not return any results
	    5) Changed @DateActive to anything else (date value) - iBatisNet results were fine


	Princeton Retirement Group, Inc - Important Terms 
	This E-mail is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any location
where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation, or which would subject
Princeton Retirement Group, Inc. or any affiliate to any registration requirement within such
	This E-mail may contain privileged or confidential information or may otherwise be protected
by work product immunity or other legal rules. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or
lost by any mistransmission. Access, copying or re-use of information by non-intended or non-authorized
recipients is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient of this E-mail, please notify
the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute
any portion of this E-mail. 
	The transmission and content of this E-mail cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.
Therefore, we cannot represent that the information in this E-mail is complete, accurate,
uncorrupted, timely or free of viruses, and Princeton Retirement Group, Inc. cannot accept
any liability for E-mails that have been altered in the course of delivery. Princeton Retirement
Group, Inc. reserves the right to monitor, review and retain all electronic communications,
including E-mail, traveling through its networks and systems (subject to and in accordance
with local laws). If any of your details are incorrect or if you no longer wish to receive
mailings such as this by E-mail please contact the sender by reply E-mail. 


View raw message