ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Raul Kripalani <ra...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Collaboration process at Ignite
Date Mon, 10 Aug 2015 22:51:45 GMT
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:

> Please don't - see my other email: the consensus in Apache isn't built on
> voting.
> If a discuss-thread can not bring the closure to an issue the vote will
> always
> be a horrible instrument for it. Some ppl will be in minority and you're
> going
> to have a badly-broken democracy all over again.

Yeah, agree. Voting isn't an instrument to use continuously and it seems
this won't be a conflictive point anyway.

I was actually concerned that this decision is being taken 2 nesting levels
into an email thread that touches on 4 other points. I would prefer a top
level thread: whether a DISCUSS or a VOTE thread, I don't actually care.
The important thing is to announce that this discussion/decision is taking
place and not keep it buried inside a wider thread.

In fact, the choice of Slack vs. IRC is actually an important topic. Other
non-ASF projects have reported higher user engagement since they migrated
from IRC to Slack. That's why I think it's a milestone and it should
receive due exposure.

Anyway, I'm happy if you guys are happy like this ;-)


*Raúl Kripalani*
Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
Integration specialist
http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message