ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Date Sun, 27 Nov 2016 04:05:29 GMT
Alexander,

I’ll encourage you to close DML example related ticket under 1.8 release as well
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4017 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4017>

Otherwise the users will hard time trying to figure out how to set up gears and use DML in
practice.

—
Denis

> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:37 AM, Alexander Paschenko <alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 
> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in
> 1.8 branch).
> 
> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed).
> 
> - Alex
> 
> 
> 
> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com>:
>> Hi
>> 
>> I found two issues for 1.8:
>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message because
>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>> 
>> Could someone experienced take a look?
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several problems
>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in ignite-1.8
>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>>> 
>>> Any objections?
>>> 
>>> Vladimir.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Denis,
>>>> 
>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But now we
>>>> have some
>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. There
>>> is a
>>>> ticket for
>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>>>> 
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Igor
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Alexander,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? Can I
>>>> start
>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>>>>> 
>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>>>>> 
>>>>> —
>>>>> Denis
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good
to
>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features
>>> on
>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On failing tests:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>>>>>> <alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Most likely today.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>:
>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems
that
>>> we
>>>>> are
>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
>>> remaining
>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch
for 1.8
>>> as
>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
>>> happen?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Roman,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released.
Recently
>>>> there
>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
>>> related
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation
versions
>>>>> co-exist at
>>>>>>>>> the same time.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version
for the
>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create
a hidden
>>>> page
>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
once
>>> the
>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page
with a suffix
>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi
will create
>>>>> readme.io <
>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>> td10868.html
>>>> <
>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>> td10868.html>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
>>>>>>>>>>  On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda
<
>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets
merged into
>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the
overall
>>> merge
>>>>>>>>> happens.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but
without DML they
>>> will
>>>>>>>>> break tests
>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense
in doing that
>>> before
>>>>> DML
>>>>>>>>> is merged.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some
time to merge my
>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>> and check
>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself,
tests and
>>>>> examples
>>>>>>>>> are ready.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn
<
>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ptupitsyn@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor
>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>> mode)
>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do
that for 1.8.
>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them
as I can. But I
>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date
yet.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
<
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
<
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda
<dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dmagda@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO)
related changes
>>> into
>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through
PDO [1] documentation
>>>>> and be
>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my
side.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete
all the .NET
>>>> usability
>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to
the Apache Ignite
>>>> users?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
<
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
<
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@gridgain.com
>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there
anyone who can
>>> take
>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko
<
>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented
(basicness is mostly
>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no
way to specify
>>>> streamer's
>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can
be improved easily).
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing
after binary hash
>>>> codes
>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
branch, I
>>>> will
>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing
tests live in
>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and
are as follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>   - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>   - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>>>>>>>>>>   - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on
first version of auto
>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is
test these very
>>>> hashing
>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those
tests passed. So
>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current
code.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Sergey Kozlov
>> GridGain Systems
>> www.gridgain.com


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message