ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Date Thu, 24 Nov 2016 09:12:29 GMT
Folks,

DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several problems
with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in ignite-1.8
branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
release (1.9, 2.0?).

Any objections?

Vladimir.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com> wrote:

> Denis,
>
> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But now we
> have some
> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. There is a
> ticket for
> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>
> Best Regards,
> Igor
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Alexander,
> >
> > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> >
> > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? Can I
> start
> > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> >
> > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
> > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > >
> > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > >
> > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features on
> > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > >
> > > On failing tests:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > focusedCommentId=15683377
> > >
> > > - Alex
> > >
> > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > > <alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com>:
> > >> Vlad,
> > >>
> > >> Most likely today.
> > >>
> > >> - Alex
> > >>
> > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>:
> > >>> Igniters,
> > >>>
> > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that
we
> > are
> > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining
> > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as
> > soon
> > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen?
> > >>>
> > >>> Vladimir.
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Roman,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently
> there
> > was
> > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related
> to
> > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
> > co-exist at
> > >>>> the same time.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
> > documentation
> > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden
> page
> > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once
the
> > next
> > >>>> version is created after the release.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
> > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
> > readme.io <
> > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html
> <
> > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> td10868.html>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> —
> > >>>> Denis
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
> > >
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > >>>>> -Roman
> > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
> > >>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Igor,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
into 1.8
> > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall
merge
> > >>>> happens.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> —
> > >>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Denis,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
they will
> > >>>> break tests
> > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
that before
> > DML
> > >>>> is merged.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge
my
> > changes
> > >>>> and check
> > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
and
> > examples
> > >>>> are ready.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>> Igor
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > ptupitsyn@apache.org
> > >>>> <mailto:ptupitsyn@apache.org>> wrote:
> > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor
> binary
> > >>>> mode)
> > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
1.8.
> > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can.
But I
> > can't
> > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org
> > >>>> <mailto:dmagda@apache.org>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
changes into
> > 1.8
> > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
documentation
> > and be
> > >>>> sure
> > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
.NET
> usability
> > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
Ignite
> users?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
<
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
<
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@gridgain.com
> > <mailto:
> > >>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone
who can take
> > over
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> —
> > >>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > >>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
> > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness
is mostly
> > about
> > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
> streamer's
> > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
easily).
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary
hash
> codes
> > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
branch, I
> will
> > ask
> > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live
in
> > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
follows:
> > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version
of auto
> > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
very
> hashing
> > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
passed. So
> > could
> > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> - Alex
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message