ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Paschenko <alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Date Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:29:49 GMT
Vlad,

Most likely today.

- Alex

2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>:
> Igniters,
>
> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that we are
> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining
> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as soon
> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen?
>
> Vladimir.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Roman,
>>
>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently there was
>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related to
>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions co-exist at
>> the same time.
>>
>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the documentation
>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden page
>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once the next
>> version is created after the release.
>>
>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create readme.io <
>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>
>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html <
>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html>
>>
>> —
>> Denis
>>
>> > On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Denis,
>> > Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>> > -Roman
>> >    On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Igor,
>> >
>> > It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8
>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge
>> happens.
>> >
>> > —
>> > Denis
>> >
>> >> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Denis,
>> >>
>> >> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will
>> break tests
>> >> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before DML
>> is merged.
>> >>
>> >> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my changes
>> and check
>> >> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and examples
>> are ready.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Igor
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupitsyn@apache.org
>> <mailto:ptupitsyn@apache.org>> wrote:
>> >> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor binary
>> mode)
>> >> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
>> >> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I can't
>> >> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>> >>
>> >> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org
>> <mailto:dmagda@apache.org>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>> >>>
>> >>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into 1.8
>> >>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation and
be
>> sure
>> >>> that everything works as described on my side.
>> >>>
>> >>> *Pavel,*
>> >>>
>> >>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET usability
>> >>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite users?
>> >>>
>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>> >>>
>> >>> —
>> >>> Denis
>> >>>
>> >>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@gridgain.com <mailto:
>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take over
>> the
>> >>> release process of 1.8?
>> >>>
>> >>> —
>> >>> Denis
>> >>>
>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> >>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Current status on DML:
>> >>>
>> >>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly about
>> >>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify streamer's
>> >>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
>> >>>
>> >>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>> >>>
>> >>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash codes
>> >>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I will ask
>> >>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>> >>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
>> >>>     - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>> >>>     - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>> >>>     - testPutWithCustomHashing
>> >>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
>> >>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very hashing
>> >>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So could
>> >>> you please take a look?
>> >>>
>> >>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>> >>>
>> >>> - Alex
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message