ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Paschenko <alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Date Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:12:06 GMT
Regarding failing tests mentioned in IGNITE-4280
(IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite related ones): reason found
(incorrect handling of old configurations where QueryEntities don't
have keyFields field), working on the patch.

- Alex

2016-11-23 16:01 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com>:
> Hi
>
> I've started the testing of the key feature introducing for 1.8: DML
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>> That is very good news! I created branch *ignite-1.8* and merged your
>> changes there. Thank you for contribution!
>>
>> Igniters,
>> Let's finalize all remaining tickets in the scope of *ignite-1.8 *branch.
>> Hopefully we will be ready for vote in several days.
>>
>> Vladimir.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Folks,
>> >
>> > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
>> > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
>> >
>> > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
>> > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
>> >
>> > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features on
>> > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>> >
>> > On failing tests:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>> > focusedCommentId=15683377
>> >
>> > - Alex
>> >
>> > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
>> > <alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com>:
>> > > Vlad,
>> > >
>> > > Most likely today.
>> > >
>> > > - Alex
>> > >
>> > > 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>:
>> > >> Igniters,
>> > >>
>> > >> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that
we
>> > are
>> > >> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining
>> > >> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as
>> > soon
>> > >> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen?
>> > >>
>> > >> Vladimir.
>> > >>
>> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Roman,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently
there
>> > was
>> > >>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related
>> to
>> > >>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
>> co-exist
>> > at
>> > >>> the same time.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
>> > documentation
>> > >>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden
>> page
>> > >>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once
the
>> > next
>> > >>> version is created after the release.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
>> > >>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create
>> > readme.io <
>> > >>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > >>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html
>> <
>> > >>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > >>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> —
>> > >>> Denis
>> > >>>
>> > >>> > On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
>> > >
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Denis,
>> > >>> > Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>> > >>> > -Roman
>> > >>> >    On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>> > >>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Igor,
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
into 1.8
>> > >>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall
merge
>> > >>> happens.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > —
>> > >>> > Denis
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> >> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> Denis,
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML
they will
>> > >>> break tests
>> > >>> >> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
that before
>> > DML
>> > >>> is merged.
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge
my
>> > changes
>> > >>> and check
>> > >>> >> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests
and
>> > examples
>> > >>> are ready.
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> Best Regards,
>> > >>> >> Igor
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>> > ptupitsyn@apache.org
>> > >>> <mailto:ptupitsyn@apache.org>> wrote:
>> > >>> >> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor
>> binary
>> > >>> mode)
>> > >>> >> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for
1.8.
>> > >>> >> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I
can. But I
>> > can't
>> > >>> >> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
<
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>> > >>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
<
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org
>> > >>> <mailto:dmagda@apache.org>> wrote:
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
changes into
>> > 1.8
>> > >>> >>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1]
documentation
>> > and be
>> > >>> sure
>> > >>> >>> that everything works as described on my side.
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> *Pavel,*
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the
.NET
>> usability
>> > >>> >>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
Ignite
>> users?
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
<
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>> > >>> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
<
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> —
>> > >>> >>> Denis
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@gridgain.com
>> > <mailto:
>> > >>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone
who can take
>> > over
>> > >>> the
>> > >>> >>> release process of 1.8?
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> —
>> > >>> >>> Denis
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>> > >>> >>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
>> > >>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> Current status on DML:
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness
is mostly
>> > about
>> > >>> >>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify
>> streamer's
>> > >>> >>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
easily).
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> - There are some tests that started failing after
binary hash
>> codes
>> > >>> >>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
branch, I
>> will
>> > ask
>> > >>> >>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live
in
>> > >>> >>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as
follows:
>> > >>> >>>     - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>> > >>> >>>     - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>> > >>> >>>     - testPutWithCustomHashing
>> > >>> >>> I added them personally during working on first version
of auto
>> > >>> >>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these
very
>> hashing
>> > >>> >>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests
passed. So
>> > could
>> > >>> >>> you please take a look?
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> - Alex
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> >
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sergey Kozlov
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com

Mime
View raw message