ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Date Thu, 24 Nov 2016 19:59:49 GMT
Hi

I found two issues for 1.8:
IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message because
node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304>
IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>

Could someone experienced take a look?

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>
wrote:

> Folks,
>
> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several problems
> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in ignite-1.8
> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next
> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>
> Any objections?
>
> Vladimir.
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com> wrote:
>
> > Denis,
> >
> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But now we
> > have some
> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. There
> is a
> > ticket for
> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Igor
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Alexander,
> > >
> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
> > >
> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? Can I
> > start
> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
> > >
> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability <
> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
> > >
> > > —
> > > Denis
> > >
> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko <
> > > alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Folks,
> > > >
> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> > > >
> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> > > >
> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features
> on
> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> > > >
> > > > On failing tests:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
> > > focusedCommentId=15683377
> > > >
> > > > - Alex
> > > >
> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> > > > <alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com>:
> > > >> Vlad,
> > > >>
> > > >> Most likely today.
> > > >>
> > > >> - Alex
> > > >>
> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>:
> > > >>> Igniters,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems
that
> we
> > > are
> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest
> remaining
> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for
1.8
> as
> > > soon
> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might
> happen?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Vladimir.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Roman,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently
> > there
> > > was
> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties
> related
> > to
> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions
> > > co-exist at
> > > >>>> the same time.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the
> > > documentation
> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create
a hidden
> > page
> > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible
once
> the
> > > next
> > > >>>> version is created after the release.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with
a suffix
> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will
create
> > > readme.io <
> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> td10868.html
> > <
> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
> > td10868.html>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> —
> > > >>>> Denis
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh
> > <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
> > > >
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Denis,
> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
> > > >>>>> -Roman
> > > >>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda
<
> > > >>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Igor,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged
into
> 1.8
> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall
> merge
> > > >>>> happens.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> —
> > > >>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Denis,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without
DML they
> will
> > > >>>> break tests
> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing
that
> before
> > > DML
> > > >>>> is merged.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time
to merge my
> > > changes
> > > >>>> and check
> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself,
tests and
> > > examples
> > > >>>> are ready.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > > >>>>>> Igor
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > > ptupitsyn@apache.org
> > > >>>> <mailto:ptupitsyn@apache.org>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor
> > binary
> > > >>>> mode)
> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that
for 1.8.
> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as
I can. But I
> > > can't
> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
<
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
<
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org
> > > >>>> <mailto:dmagda@apache.org>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
changes
> into
> > > 1.8
> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO
[1] documentation
> > > and be
> > > >>>> sure
> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,*
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all
the .NET
> > usability
> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the
Apache Ignite
> > users?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
<
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
<
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@gridgain.com
> > > <mailto:
> > > >>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone
who can
> take
> > > over
> > > >>>> the
> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> —
> > > >>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko
<
> > > >>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness
is mostly
> > > about
> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way
to specify
> > streamer's
> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved
easily).
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after
binary hash
> > codes
> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
branch, I
> > will
> > > ask
> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests
live in
> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are
as follows:
> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
> > > >>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
> > > >>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first
version of auto
> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test
these very
> > hashing
> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those
tests passed. So
> > > could
> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current
code.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> - Alex
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message