ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <alkuznetsov...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: one point optimisation
Date Wed, 05 Apr 2017 12:00:48 GMT
The test shows as follows:
            assertMessageCount(GridNearTxPrepareRequest.class, 1);
            assertMessageCount(GridDhtTxPrepareRequest.class, 1);
            assertMessageCount(GridDhtTxPrepareResponse.class, 1);
            assertMessageCount(GridNearTxPrepareResponse.class, 1);
            assertMessageCount(GridNearTxFinishRequest.class, 1);
            assertMessageCount(GridDhtTxFinishRequest.class, 0);
            assertMessageCount(GridNearTxFinishResponse.class, 1);

ср, 5 апр. 2017 г. в 14:53, Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com>:

> Aleksey,
>
> Can you elaborate on which of the extra messages you observe?
>
> --AG
>
> 2017-04-04 14:17 GMT+03:00 ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <alkuznetsov.sb@gmail.com>:
>
> > any thoughts on one phase commit realization ?
> >
> > пн, 3 апр. 2017 г. в 19:35, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <alkuznetsov.sb@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> > > I've attached test that prints messages exchange . Which shows us that
> > > there are more messages then you declared in article. Perhaps,
> > > implementation has changed.
> > > I created it on base of IgniteOnePhaseCommitNearSelfTest
> > >
> > > пн, 3 апр. 2017 г. в 19:03, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > Aleksey,
> > >
> > > The blog describes the 1-phase commit at a high level, but I am still
> > > curious about the differences you found. Can you share them here?
> > >
> > > D.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:11 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <
> > > alkuznetsov.sb@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Regarding IgniteOnePhaseCommitNearSelfTest test , ignite's one phase
> > > > optimisation works not as you said.
> > > > I attached picture of message exchange. There are partial prepare
> phase
> > > > exists, along with finish phase.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > пн, 3 апр. 2017 г. в 10:55, Christos Erotocritou <
> > christos@gridgain.com
> > > >:
> > > >
> > > >> As far as I know a partition is always allocated to a specific node
> > and
> > > >> does not span nodes. Ignite has default 1024 partitions on start
> that
> > > are
> > > >> split equally across nodes.
> > > >>
> > > >> > On 3 Apr 2017, at 08:10, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <
> > alkuznetsov.sb@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > in ur blog u texted belonging to the same partition is nessesary
> > for 1
> > > >> > phase commit. But its not guarantee belonging to the same node.
> > > >> Partition
> > > >> > may span many nodes
> > > >> >
> > > >> > вс, 2 Апр 2017 г., 13:46 ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <
> > alkuznetsov.sb@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> thank u !
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> пт, 31 Мар 2017 г., 21:06 Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Here is a good blog post about 1phase commit impl in Ignite
and
> its
> > > >> >> advantages:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> http://gridgain.blogspot.com/2014/09/one-phase-commit-fast-
> > > >> transactions-for.html
> > > >> >> <
> > > >> >> http://gridgain.blogspot.com/2014/09/one-phase-commit-fast-
> > > >> transactions-for.html
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Took a reference to it from there:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/transactions#section-
> > > >> two-phase-commit-2pc
> > > >> >> <
> > > >> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/transactions#section-
> > > >> two-phase-commit-2pc
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> —
> > > >> >> Denis
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>> On Mar 31, 2017, at 12:27 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> > > >> dsetrakyan@apache.org>
> > > >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:25 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <
> > > >> >> alkuznetsov.sb@gmail.com
> > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>> Igniters! What is the point of one phase optimisation?
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Performance
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> --
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> *Best Regards,*
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> *Kuznetsov Aleksey*
> > > >> >>
> > > >> > --
> > > >> >
> > > >> > *Best Regards,*
> > > >> >
> > > >> > *Kuznetsov Aleksey*
> > > >>
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > *Best Regards,*
> > > >
> > > > *Kuznetsov Aleksey*
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > *Best Regards,*
> > >
> > > *Kuznetsov Aleksey*
> > >
> > --
> >
> > *Best Regards,*
> >
> > *Kuznetsov Aleksey*
> >
>
-- 

*Best Regards,*

*Kuznetsov Aleksey*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message