ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitry Melnichuk <dmitry.melnic...@nobitlost.com>
Subject Re: Thin Client lib: Python
Date Thu, 26 Jul 2018 13:51:16 GMT
Hi, Ilya!

I considered this option. Indeed, the code would look cleaner if only 
one kind of identifier (preferably the human-readable name) was used. 
But there can be a hypothetical situation, when the user is left with 
hash code only. (For example, obtained from some other API.) It would be 
sad to have an identifier and not be able to use it.

Now I really think about using hash codes and names interchangeably, so both

cache_put(conn, 'my-cache', value=1, key='a')


cache_put(conn, my_hash_code, value=1, key='a')

will be allowed.

This will be a minor complication on my side, and quite reasonable one.

On 07/26/2018 10:44 PM, Ilya Kasnacheev wrote:
> Hello!
> Why not use cache name as string here, instead of cache_id()?
> cache_put(conn, 'my-cache', value=1, key='a')
> Regards,

View raw message