ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Upgrading Ignite to JCache 1.1
Date Thu, 02 Aug 2018 21:11:22 GMT
Thanks to everyone for making it happen!

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 6:52 AM, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov.spb@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Anton, Alexander, Denis, Nikita, Pavel,
>
> It is very good contribution. It resolved license issue with JCache 1.0.
>
> Thank you guys for making this happen.
>
> Sincerely,
> Dmitriy Pavlov
>
> чт, 2 авг. 2018 г. в 16:37, Anton Vinogradov <av@apache.org>:
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > We officially support JCache 1.1 now [1].
> >
> > Huge thanks to everyone who hepled us:
> > - Alexander Menshikov
> > - Denis Garus
> > - Amelchev Nikita
> > - Pavel Pereslegin
> >
> > [1]
> >
> > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=1578758&
> tab=queuedBuildOverviewTab
> >
> > чт, 19 июл. 2018 г. в 16:12, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradurvs@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi, Alex!
> > >
> > > Could you also help with the ticket [1]? If you have time.
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9020
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:50 PM Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Pavel,
> > > >
> > > > Could you chime in please?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Denis
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 6:43 AM Nikita Amelchev <
> nsamelchev@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Igniters.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm implementing new version TCK 1.1 and I found the problem [1] in
> > the
> > > > > .NET module.
> > > > >
> > > > > In brief, .NET creates cache entry event based on values exist
> > > checking.
> > > > >
> > > > > TCK 1.1 says that getValue() not null for REMOVE/EXPIRED events if
> > old
> > > > > value required and it breaks logic.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm looking for a .net contributor. Anyone ready to help?
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9020
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-06-15 14:35 GMT+03:00 Александр Меньшиков <
> sharplermc@gmail.com
> > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Denis, I think we can include it to a minor release. Because the
> > > network
> > > > > > protocol, API, binary compatibility will be saved. And all
> behavior
> > > > > > changes, in fact, make implementation closer to the documentation
> > of
> > > > > JCache
> > > > > > 1.0. Because TCK 1.1.0 in general fixes differents between
> > > documentation
> > > > > > and tests in 1.0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2018-06-14 21:41 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Guys, are you targeting this for the next big Ignite release?
> > > Should be
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > 3 m from now.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Denis
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 2:58 AM Anton Vinogradov <
> av@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Corrected IEP URL:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-
> > > > > > > 21%3A+JCache+1.1+support
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > чт, 14 июн. 2018 г. в 12:48, Александр Меньшиков <
> > > > > sharplermc@gmail.com
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Igniters,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I've prepared IEP-21 [1] for this JCache updating task.
> > > > > > > > > It will help us to manage the issues and see the progress
> in
> > > one
> > > > > > place.
> > > > > > > > > Also, we have finally added tests for TCK 1.1.0 [2] to our
> TC
> > > which
> > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > run on any branch.
> > > > > > > > > Both tests cases (for 1.0.1 and for 1.1.0) will coexist
> until
> > > > > IEP-21
> > > > > > > > > finish.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-21:+JCache+1.1
> > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=
> > > > > > > IgniteTests24Java8_JCacheTck11
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2018-06-06 0:49 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dmagda@gridgain.com
> >:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Agree, I see zero benefits of being compliant with both
> > > > > > specification
> > > > > > > > > > versions. Let’s just focus on the latest one.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Denis
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, June 5, 2018, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> > > > > dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Alex,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I think it is OK to break TCK 1.0.1 tests in favor of
> TCK
> > > 1.1.
> > > > > > Once
> > > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > > > finish the migration, I would remove the TCK 1.0.1 test
> > > suite
> > > > > > > > > altogether.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > D.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:13 AM, Александр Меньшиков <
> > > > > > > > > > sharplermc@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Okay. There are tests results:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=1361493&
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > tab=buildResultsDiv&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_JCacheTck11
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > It's the same as locally.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Also, I have created sub-tasks for all problems we
> > have:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1) CacheManagerTest.getUnsafeTypedCacheRequest
> failed.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8704
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2) CacheMBStatisticsBeanTest.testClear failed.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8705
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3) CacheManagerTest.close_cachesEmpty failed.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8708
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4) CacheMBStatisticsBeanTest.testPutIfAbsent failed.
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8709
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 5) CacheEntryEvent.getOldValue should be available.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Two tests fail because of it.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Looks like a bug.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8714
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 6) Problems with Closeable objects from Factory
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > *98* tests fail because of it.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8715
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > For first 4 problems, I already have PRs.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Problems 2) and 3) will break tests for TCK 1.0.1
> > because
> > > > > these
> > > > > > > > tests
> > > > > > > > > > > work
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrong in 1.0.1,
> > > > > > > > > > > > and were fixed in 1.1.0.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-06-05 14:37 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Pavlov <
> > > > > > dpavlov.spb@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Agree with Nikolay we should create build plan, and
> > we
> > > can
> > > > > > use
> > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > build
> > > > > > > > > > > > > plan in developement branch.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Merge to master is not necessary before issue is
> > ready.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > вт, 5 июн. 2018 г. в 14:04, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > > > > > > nizhikov@apache.org
> > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Alex, please try to run this build plan for your
> > > branch
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> IgniteTests24Java8_JCacheTck11
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 13:56 +0300, Nikolay Izhikov
> > пишет:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Guys, we had a private talk with Vyacheslav and
> > > Dmitriy
> > > > > > > > Pavlov.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Here are its resulst:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > 1. I will create JCache1.1 build plan.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > I will be able to run tests with Alex new
> profile
> > > > > enabled.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > So, Alex can run and share with community tests
> > > results
> > > > > > both
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > jcache
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> 1.0 and jcache 1.1.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > 2. Alex, please, create tickets for a JCache
> 1.1.
> > > > > issues.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 13:36 +0300, Vyacheslav
> Daradur
> > > > > пишет:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > AFAIK TeamCity is not able to create such
> > > build-plan
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > fly.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Moreover, we will not be able to test master
> > > branch in
> > > > > > > both
> > > > > > > > > > > profiles
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > in this case.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Am I miss something?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Nikolay
> Izhikov
> > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > nizhikov@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Vyacheslav,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Let's create build plan on TC for this
> > profile.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Why we need to merge it in master now?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 13:29 +0300, Vyacheslav
> > > Daradur
> > > > > > > пишет:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Nikolay, there isn't anything broken in
> PR.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > The PR is needed to add new build-plan on
> > TC.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > We need tools to check that fixes for 1.1
> > > don't
> > > > > > break
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> compatibility with 1.0.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Кузнецов
> > > Алексей
> > > > > > > Львович
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > <alkuznetsov.sb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > After Alexander create separate tickets
> > for
> > > > > failed
> > > > > > > > > tests,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> everybody is free
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > to fix them.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > So we can proceed faster issue
> resolving.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hello, Igniters.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Actually, I don't understand why we
> > should
> > > > > merge
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > master
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> something
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > broken.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Currently, Ignite is not ready for
> > JCache
> > > 1.1.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Only change I see in PR is new profile
> > > [1].
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Is it required to have it to continue
> > > jcache
> > > > > 1.1
> > > > > > > > > support
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> implementation?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I think Alexandex can proceed with
> > current
> > > > > > profile
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > change
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> it  to run
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > tests for JCache 1.1 his own branch.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Am I miss something?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4114
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > В Вт, 05/06/2018 в 12:50 +0300, Dmitry
> > > Pavlov
> > > > > > > пишет:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Alexander,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/
> > > > > > > jira/browse/IGNITE-8687
> > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > 'In
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> progress'. Is it
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > expected?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Nikolay, have you some time to apply
> > > patch,
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > passes
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> review?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > вт, 5 июн. 2018 г. в 5:09, Dmitriy
> > > > > Setrakyan <
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> dsetrakyan@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks, Alex! Sounds like a good
> > plan.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 5:52 AM,
> > > Александр
> > > > > > > > > Меньшиков
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > <sharplermc@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Igniters!
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I have taken a look at the
> jcache
> > > 1.1
> > > > > spec
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > TCK.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > And I can write a brief summary
> of
> > > my
> > > > > plan
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > solve
> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> task.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I have found 6 problems in
> current
> > > > > master
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > TCK
> > > > > > > > > > > 1.1
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> (104 failed
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > tests).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Of course, we should run this
> TCK
> > > on CI
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> absolutely sure we didn't
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > miss something.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So the first step is an adding
> TCK
> > > 1.1
> > > > > > suite
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > our
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Team City.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I have created sub-task [1] for
> it
> > > and
> > > > > > > > prepared
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > PR
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> [2].
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I need someone with access to
> > merge
> > > PR
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > add
> > > > > > > > > > suite
> > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Team City.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > It going to be just a clone of
> the
> > > > > current
> > > > > > > > > > > jcache-tck
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> suite, but with
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > using
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > the new profile.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > You can test new profile locally
> > > with
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> command:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > mvn test
> -P-release,jcache-tck-1.1
> > > -pl
> > > > > > > > > > :ignite-core
> > > > > > > > > > > > -am
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > After that, I will start to add
> > > sub-task
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > every
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> problem we have.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Nikolay, can you please help me
> > with
> > > > > > merging
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> adding to the
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > suite?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > [1]JIRA:
> > https://issues.apache.org/
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> jira/browse/IGNITE-8687
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > [2]PR:
> https://github.com/apache/
> > > > > > > > > > > > ignite/pull/4114/files
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > [3]CI:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/
> > > > > > > > > > > > viewType.html?buildTypeId=
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&
> > > > > > > > > > > branch_IgniteTests24Java8=
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> pull/4114/head&tab=
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > buildTypeStatusDiv
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2018-05-23 14:31 GMT+03:00
> > Александр
> > > > > > > > Меньшиков <
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> sharplermc@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Slava. You are right.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > 2018-05-23 14:00 GMT+03:00
> > > Vyacheslav
> > > > > > > > Daradur
> > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> daradurvs@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Alex!
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Please have a look at maven
> > > profile
> > > > > > > named
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> "jcache-tck".
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I believe this is what you
> are
> > > > > looking
> > > > > > > > for.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at
> 11:50
> > > AM,
> > > > > > > > Александр
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Меньшиков
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > <sharplermc@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I can do it. As I
> > see
> > > we
> > > > > > > already
> > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> JCache TCK tests in
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > TC.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Can I take somewhere
> > > > > settings/script
> > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> using?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-05-23 2:58 GMT+03:00
> > > Dmitriy
> > > > > > > > > Setrakyan
> > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > :
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It will be great if
> > someone
> > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > community
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> would pick this up.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > amount
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of changes are minimal
> and
> > > many
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > > > only
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> have to do with
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > clarifying the
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > documentation. However,
> > > removing
> > > > > > JSR
> > > > > > > > 107
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> license confusion in 1.1
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > would be
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > great for Ignite.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > D.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at
> > > 3:04 PM,
> > > > > > > Denis
> > > > > > > > > > > Magda <
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> dmagda@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is a list of all
> > > changes:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > https://groups.google.com/
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> forum/#!topic/jsr107/BC1qKqknzKU
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The primary argument
> for
> > > the
> > > > > > > > migration
> > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> license. JCache 1.0
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > licensed
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by Oracle that causes
> > > legal
> > > > > > issues
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> of the users. Once we
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to JCache 1.1 the
> won't
> > > longer
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > big
> > > > > > > > > > > > deal.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, once we move
> to
> > > 1.1
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > need
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> sure that we comply
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > updated specification.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Denis
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018
> at
> > > 5:20
> > > > > AM,
> > > > > > > > > Dmitry
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Pavlov <
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > dpavlov.spb@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Denis,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What was improved in
> > > JCache
> > > > > > 1.1?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would it be useful
> for
> > > > > product
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > change
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> supported spec.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > version?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пн, 21 мая 2018 г. в
> > > 20:12,
> > > > > > > Denis
> > > > > > > > > > Magda
> > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> dmagda@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eventually, JCache
> > was
> > > > > > > > relicensed
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Apache 2.0 and released
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 1.1
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > version:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > https://groups.google.com/
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> forum/#!topic/jsr107/BC1qKqknzKU
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there anyone
> > > interested
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > upgrading
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Ignite to the new
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > version for
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > next release?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> jira/browse/IGNITE-8548
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Denis
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, Vyacheslav D.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best wishes,
> > > > > Amelchev Nikita
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards, Vyacheslav D.
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message