ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anton Vinogradov ...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Removing "fabric" from Ignite binary package name
Date Fri, 03 Aug 2018 14:28:40 GMT
I can perform proper refactoring by myself.

Peter, could you assist me with TC in that case?

пт, 3 авг. 2018 г. в 17:17, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>:

> Agree with Denis. Let's do the simple refactoring first, and then more
> complicated one in phase 2.
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 6:47 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Thus, my suggestion is:
> > >  — find and update all hardcoded “fabric” usage on TC, so that they
> work
> > > both with or without fabric in name of binaries
> > >  — use current implementation — review and merge to master
> > >  — plan full suffix refactoring (as Anton suggests) on the next
> > iterations
> > > with no rush
> >
> >
> > I like this plan which allows us to do the things. I see the current
> > implementation as one of the steps of the overall refactoring proposed by
> > Anton. It sounds normal if we split refactoring into pieces.
> >
> > Anton, do you have time to help with the rest of refactoring tasks before
> > AI 2.7? It's great if we close the whole tasks by that time. Otherwise,
> > let's split it and release the current implementation first.
> >
> > --
> > Denis
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:18 AM Petr Ivanov <mr.weider@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Dmitriy,
> > >
> > > I cannot forecast estimates for this task as it dependents on many
> > factors:
> > >  — I will be able to start researching the Anton’s implementation
> > > suggestion not earlier than the beginning of September
> > >  — I am not acquainted with assembly configuration well, it may take
> some
> > > considerable time to understand how correctly get rid of “fabric” not
> > > touching everything else
> > >  — the process of review and merge can also drag on indefinitely (based
> > on
> > > the previous attempt to introduce this changes)
> > >
> > >
> > > Vladimir,
> > >
> > > If community will approve this hack, I’ll implement it.
> > > Yet it won’t resolve the problem of building from sources not on TC —
> the
> > > fabric will stay in names of binaries and folders inside.
> > > And it will add problems when the correct implementation will be
> > > introduced.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thus, my suggestion is:
> > >  — find and update all hardcoded “fabric” usage on TC, so that they
> work
> > > both with or without fabric in name of binaries
> > >  — use current implementation — review and merge to master
> > >  — plan full suffix refactoring (as Anton suggests) on the next
> > iterations
> > > with no rush
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 3 Aug 2018, at 09:50, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Folks,
> > > >
> > > > Can you please explain the problem with TC and artifacts? Can we just
> > > > rename final artifact at the end of a build phase just before
> signing,
> > > and
> > > > leave the rest TC infrastructure as is?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:28 AM Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> > dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Anton, Petr,
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks for your readiness to assist. Can this be done for 2.7
> release?
> > > >>
> > > >> D.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:32 AM, Anton Vinogradov <av@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> What I see is that we spent almost a year discussing how to do
> this.
> > > >>> I'm pretty sure we had enough time to do everything properly.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> So, proposal is to stop this discussion and start refactoring.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I do not see any pitfalls and ready to assist if necessary.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> чт, 2 авг. 2018 г. в 5:14, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > >:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I vote to remove the fabric from the build in the easiest way
> > > possible.
> > > >>> Can
> > > >>>> other Igniters comment?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> D.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Petr Ivanov <mr.weider@gmail.com
> >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> My concern here is exactly about internal build processes —
> > removing
> > > >>>>> fabric from the name of binary archive (with any way) will break
> > lots
> > > >>> of
> > > >>>>> them.
> > > >>>>> There will be no sacrifices, just lots of work for fixing build
> > > >>> processes
> > > >>>>> (where we won’t be able to introduce changes proactively).
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Therefore only fabric removal implementation (quick with some
> > legacy
> > > >>> left
> > > >>>>> or full refactoring) is on the agenda.
> > > >>>>> And this matter should be jugged by the community: currently we
> > have
> > > >>> (if
> > > >>>>> our voices are equal) 1:1 with Anton about it.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On 1 Aug 2018, at 22:28, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > >
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Let's focus on what is important here. Our users do not care
> about
> > > >>> our
> > > >>>>>> internal build process.If we could remove the word fabric from
> the
> > > >>> next
> > > >>>>>> release without any significant sacrifices in the build process
> or
> > > >>>> making
> > > >>>>>> it less maintainable, I suggest we do it.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> D.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Petr Ivanov <
> mr.weider@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Simple way with some hack and legacy maintenance: accept patch
> as
> > > >> it
> > > >>>> is
> > > >>>>>>> implemented now.
> > > >>>>>>> Hard way: full assembly refactoring and hadoop rejection.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Anyway, after this is merged to master — complete automation
> > > >> systems
> > > >>>>>>> revision (TeamCity for example) is required due to heavy
> hardcode
> > > >> of
> > > >>>>>>> “fabric” in such systems.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On 1 Aug 2018, at 21:55, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> > > >> dsetrakyan@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> OK, so what is the plan? How do we get rid of the fabric name?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> D.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 2:21 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
> av@apache.org
> > >
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Since you proposing patch to the community, you are the very
> > man
> > > >>> :)
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> ср, 1 авг. 2018 г. в 12:16, Petr Ivanov <mr.weider@gmail.com
> >:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> You are convincing the wrong person.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 1 Aug 2018, at 12:05, Anton Vinogradov <av@apache.org>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Peter,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> We had a discussion about how to do this properly.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Proposed solution cannot be merged, since it makes code
> > harder
> > > >>>> than
> > > >>>>> it
> > > >>>>>>>>>> was.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> The only case is to perform complete refactoring and get
> rid
> > > >> of
> > > >>>> all
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> postfixes and other weird stuff.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> For example
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - <ignite.zip.pattern>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - <ignite.edition>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> should be definetely removed from code.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> ср, 1 авг. 2018 г. в 9:39, Peter Ivanov <
> mr.weider@gmail.com
> > > >>> :
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The task was ready long ago, but community failed to
> review
> > > >> and
> > > >>>>> merge
> > > >>>>>>>>> it
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Not being a committer, my capabilities of introducing such
> > > >>>> changes
> > > >>>>>>> are
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> limited.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I will update code during this week and will pass for
> review
> > > >>> once
> > > >>>>>>>>> again.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 00:24, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> > > >>>>>>> dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, agree, fabric has to be removed. If it is done in
> 2.7,
> > > >>>> would
> > > >>>>> be
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> great!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Denis Magda <
> > > >>> dmagda@apache.org
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter, folks,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's weird, but we have been failing to introduce this
> > > >> minor
> > > >>>>> change
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> since
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> December. Can we get it done for 2.7 that is being
> > > >> discussed
> > > >>> at
> > > >>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> moment?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there any technical issues that block you from
> merging
> > > >>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>> changes?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:03 PM Peter Ivanov <
> > > >>>>> mr.weider@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, then I will update issue code and start preparation
> > > >> for
> > > >>>>> build
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration changes.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 at 23:41, Denis Magda <
> > > >> dmagda@apache.org
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With which one — current implementation in issue?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the answer to your question:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. quickly fix all of them (can be solved by
> preliminary
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> preparations —
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> searching for -fabric- usages in build configuration);
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. update all branches to master because otherwise old
> > > >>>> branch
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> will
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stop
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Petr Ivanov <
> > > >>>>> mr.weider@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jun 2018, at 23:04, Denis Magda <
> > > >> dmagda@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with the suggested approach.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With which one — current implementation in issue?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, not sure we need to update
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all the branches. Can't branch owners just pull the
> > > >>> changes
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> back
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master if the plan to merge back later?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, we as an initiative group of this issue
> > > >> should
> > > >>> do
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will lie on shoulders of developers.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Petr Ivanov <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mr.weider@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The most simple approach — repack and rearchive
> > binary
> > > >>>>> archive
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release build, however that would not resolve the
> > > >>> problem
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> globally
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will require fixing every build configuration we
> have
> > > >> on
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> TeamCity).
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current approach implemented in task — creates
> > already
> > > >>>>> correct
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary archive name, but old name (with -fabric-)
> is
> > > >>> used
> > > >>>> in
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> almost
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build configuration too and merge code to master
> will
> > > >>>>> require
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. quickly fix all of them (can be solved by
> > > >> preliminary
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preparations
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — searching for -fabric- usages in build
> > > >> configuration);
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. update all branches to master because otherwise
> > old
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stop building.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jun 2018, at 22:42, Denis Magda <
> > > >>> dmagda@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petr,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for pulling up the conversation.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I still prefer us not to complicate the things and
> > > >> just
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> remove
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "fabric"
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the *package name*. Use the easiest way
> > > >> possible.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I don't care about Hadoop and would
> not
> > > >>>> suggest
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasting its time on it. So, just rename the
> > > >>>>> suffixes/prefixes
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files the way you like to address Anton's
> concerns.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Petr Ivanov <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mr.weider@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets define once again what should be done in
> this
> > > >> [1]
> > > >>>>> task?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If current implementation is good, than I’ll
> update
> > > >> it
> > > >>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> master
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for review.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet, there is other part of the task which
> concerns
> > > >>> our
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> build
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — I
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that almost all our build configurations
> > will
> > > >>>> fail
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> due
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change and there is no simple way of updating
> > > >>>>> configurations
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge task to master and start fixing failing
> > > >> builds.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Feb 2018, at 01:56, Denis Magda <
> > > >>>> dmagda@apache.org
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think we necessarily need to remove
> > > >> 'fabric'
> > > >>>>> word
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the project, we just need to rename the name
> > of
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloadable
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Couldn’t say it better than you, Val. Thanks for
> > > >>>> pitching
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly what the ticket is about.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 9, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Valentin
> Kulichenko
> > <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anton,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think we necessarily need to remove
> > > >> 'fabric'
> > > >>>>> word
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the project, we just need to rename the name
> > of
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloadable
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package. Is
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there any other place where 'fabric' is exposed
> > to
> > > >>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> user?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that's the case, it should not be a big
> > change,
> > > >>> no?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Val
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Anton
> Vinogradov
> > <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avinogradov@gridgain.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're proposing changes without viewing a
> code
> > > >> :)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:07 PM, Denis Magda <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anton,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What’s wrong if we just go ahead and:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - replace “fabric” with “ignite”
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - replace “hadoop” with “ignite-hadoop"
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 1:51 AM, Anton
> Vinogradov <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avinogradov@gridgain.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "hadoop" and "fabric" words work on same
> > > >> engine.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have special assembly desctiptors, for
> > > >>> example:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies-fabric.xml
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies-fabric-lgpl.xml
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies-hadoop.xml
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-base.xml
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-fabric.xml
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-fabric-base.xml
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-fabric-lgpl.xml
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-hadoop.xml
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I'ts impossible for now to remove
> "fabric"
> > > >>>>> without
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "hadoop"
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removal.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only one case is to make some ditry hack,
> but
> > > >>>> that's
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> not
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> idea.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Sergey
> Kozlov
> > > >> <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skozlov@gridgain.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 hadoop accelerator removing for AI 2.5
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also probably IGFS should be either removed
> > or
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> refactored,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.g.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FS
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directly over the data region without using
> > > >>>> "cache"
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> entity
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intermidiate stage
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Denis
> Magda <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anton,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don’t get how the hadoop editions are
> > > >> related
> > > >>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> task.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not named as “data fabric” for a while.
> > > >>> Check
> > > >>>> up
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> docs.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The “fabric” word is being removed from
> all
> > > >>> over
> > > >>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> places
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needs
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be removed from the editions’ names.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for the hadoop future, my personal
> > > >> position
> > > >>> is
> > > >>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> retire
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> component
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and forget about it. I would restart the
> > > >>>>> conversation
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 2.4.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2018, at 2:13 AM, Anton
> > > >> Vinogradov <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> av@apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, Petr,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I checked PR and found we have
> > > >>> *overcomplicated*
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> logic
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "fabric"
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "hadoop" postfixs.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we really need to assembly 2 editions?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hadoop" edition still valued?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My proposal is to get rid of "hadoop"
> > > >> edition
> > > >>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> replace
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction of how to use "fabric"
> edition
> > > >>>>> instead.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instruction will be pretty easy -> move
> > > >>> "hadoop"
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "optional"
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> root directory :)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we can just remove all
> postfix
> > > >>>> logic
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> from
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poms
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simplify release process.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Denis
> > > >> Magda <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petr, thanks for solving it!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope that Anton V. or some other build
> > > >> master
> > > >>>>> will
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> double-check
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes and merge them.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 28, 2017, at 8:29 AM, Petr
> > Ivanov <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mr.weider@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7251 is done, needs review and
> > some
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> additional
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3315 [1].
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315
> > > >>>>> <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/
> > ignite/pull/3315
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Dec 2017, at 23:15, Denis Magda
> <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petr, thanks, such a swift turnaround!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you found the one who can asses
> > and
> > > >>>> review
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maintainers label might be helpful.
> > Just
> > > >>> ping
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> them
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directly:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-
> > ReviewProcessandMaintainers
> > > >> <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> confluence/display/IGNITE/How+
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-
> > ReviewProcessandMaintainers>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 20, 2017, at 12:24 AM, Petr
> > > >> Ivanov
> > > >>> <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mr.weider@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assigned myself — done the same work
> > > >> while
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> preparing
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RPM
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But for fixing DEVNOTES.txt waiting
> > for
> > > >>>> review
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7107 [1].
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-7107
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 Dec 2017, at 22:55, Denis
> > Magda <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the bids were accepted and the
> > > >>> verdict
> > > >>>> is
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> executed:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/
> > > >>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-7251>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is ready to pick this up?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:35 AM, Anton
> > > >>>>> Vinogradov
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avinogradov@gridgain.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1б фо шур
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:59 AM,
> > > >>> Vladimir
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ozerov <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1б вуаштшеудн
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:34 AM,
> > > >>> Valentin
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kulichenko
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:24 PM,
> > > >>>> Dmitriy
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Setrakyan
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dsetrakyan@apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (completely agree)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:21
> AM,
> > > >>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Magda <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Ignite binary releases
> > > >> still
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> include
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “fabric”
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> word
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> names:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> download.cgi#binaries
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> download.cgi#binaries
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For instance, this is a full
> > name
> > > >>> of
> > > >>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previous
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-ignite-fabric-2.3.0-bin.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s a little oversight on our
> > > >> side
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> because
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> positioned as a fabric for a
> > > >> while.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposal! Remove “fabric” from
> > the
> > > >>>> name
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as -
> > apache-ignite-{version}-bin.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we’re in consensus then
> let’s
> > > >>> make
> > > >>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message