ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org>
Subject Re: C++ Thin client. JVM dependency.
Date Thu, 09 Aug 2018 15:29:43 GMT
Hi,

This is not true, thin client does not depend on libignite. It only
depends on libignite-binary and libignite-common. Neither of them
depends on jvm.

Best Regards,
Igor


On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 4:16 PM Nikolay Izhikov <nizhikov@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello, Igniters.
>
> I have a question from one of an early adopter of Ignite C++ thin client.
> Seems, that our C++ thin client depends on JVM lib.
>
> thin-client [1] depends on libignite, and libignite depends on jvm libs
> [2].
>
> Is that correct?
> Why do we need it?
> I thought that a thin client is a binary protocol with minimum
> dependencies.
> Do we have the plan to reduce that dependency?
>
> Igor, can you comment on this?
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/modules/platforms/cpp/thin-client/Makefile.am#L40
> [2]
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/modules/platforms/cpp/core/Makefile.am#L30

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message