ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Best Effort Affinity for thin clients
Date Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:08:14 GMT
Hello guys,

I've updated IEP page [1] describing proposed solution in more details and
proposing some changes for a protocol.

Please, take a look and let me know what you think.

[1] -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-23%3A+Best+Effort+Affinity+for+thin+clients

Best Regards,
Igor


On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:54 AM Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>
wrote:

> Denis,
>
> Yes, in principle we can extend it. We are going to implement it in
> subsequent phases of this IEP.
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > Feel that this functionality can be extended to the automatic
> reconnect,
> > > can't it? Presently we require to provide a static list of IPs to be
> used
> > > at a reconnect time. By having a partition map of all the nodes, the
> thin
> > > client should be able to automate this piece.
> > >
> >
> > Not sure if static IP list can be avoided. What Igor is suggesting is
> that
> > we try to pick the best node out of the static IP  list.
> >
> > D.
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message