ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Artem Budnikov <a.budnikov.ign...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]
Date Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:20:14 GMT
Hi everyone,

We published the draft of Ignite 2.9 documentation on the Apache Ignite 
web-site. The docs are available via the following link:

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/2.9.0/installation/installing-using-docker

Alex,

Is there an estimate for the release date?

-Artem

On 26.08.2020 17:47, Alex Plehanov wrote:
> Denis,
>
> Currently, we are running mostly IgnitePutTxImplicitBenchmark without
> persistence. For other benchmarks drop is lower and it's harder to find
> problematic commit.
>
> ср, 26 авг. 2020 г. в 17:34, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>:
>
>> Alex,
>>
>> Thanks for sending an update. The drop is quite big. What are the types of
>> benchmarks you are observing the degradation for (atomic puts,
>> transactions, sql, etc.)?
>>
>> Let us know if any help by particular committers is required.
>>
>> -
>> Denis
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:26 AM Alex Plehanov <plehanov.alex@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, guys!
>>>
>>> We finally have some benchmark results. Looks like there is more than one
>>> commit with a performance drop. Detected drops for those commits only
>>> slightly higher than measurement error, so it was hard to find them and
>> we
>>> are not completely sure we found them all and found them right.
>>>
>>> Drops detected:
>>> 2-3% drop on commit 99b0e0143e0 (IGNITE-13060 Tracing: initial
>>> implementation)
>>> 2-3% drop on commit 65c30ec6947 (IGNITE-12568 MessageFactory is
>> refactored
>>> in order to detect registration of message with the same direct type)
>>>
>>> The total drop we have on our environment - 7-8% and perhaps there is
>>> something else here (benchmarks still in progress, I will write if we
>> find
>>> more suspected commits).
>>>
>>> Ivan Artiukhov, can you please recheck mentioned above commits on your
>>> environment?
>>>
>>>
>>> чт, 20 авг. 2020 г. в 11:43, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnacheev@gmail.com
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> Readme.io uses blue book :)
>>>>
>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/performance-tips
>>>>
>>>> I was thinking of something along a blue circle with `i' in it, for
>>>> information items.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> --
>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ср, 19 авг. 2020 г. в 18:29, Artem Budnikov <
>> a.budnikov.ignite@gmail.com
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>>> Search does not seem to work.
>>>>> It uses mockups right now, but it should be ready when the docs are
>>>>> released.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I can see that note blocks are just annotated with "Note." Can we
>>> have
>>>>> some
>>>>>> image there?
>>>>> Do you have a preference as to which image you would like to see
>> there?
>>>>> -Artem
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19.08.2020 17:37, Ilya Kasnacheev wrote:
>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Search does not seem to work. Are we going to have a proper search
>>>>> results
>>>>>> page? It is often the case that there's none.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can see that note blocks are just annotated with "Note." Can we
>>> have
>>>>> some
>>>>>> image there? Example is
>>>>>> http://64.227.57.229/docs/2.9.0/persistence/persistence-tuning
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,

Mime
View raw message