Ilya,
Please see below.
-Val
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 1:54 AM Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnacheev@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I don't like reliance on ignitectl utility. It should be available but it
> should be accompanied by some Java API in my opinion.
>
I think there will be an API, but that's more about the design of the tool,
which I believe should be unified. I'm going to create a separate IEP and a
separate discussion for this.
>
> I don't understand how to peer deploy my code if I run a client from my
> IDE, along with all dependencies. I think that easy-to-develop is crucial
> for any product.
>
What is the ideal process in your view?
>
> I also think this is a drawback compared to e.g. existing
> PeerAssemblyLoading in .Net.
>
In which way? Can you please clarify? Generally speaking, I think .Net
assemblies should be deployed in the same way as JAR files.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> пт, 25 сент. 2020 г. в 04:43, Valentin Kulichenko <
> valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com>:
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > During the meetup dedicated to Ignite 3.0 [1], one of the items I've
> > mentioned was JAR based code deployment, as an alternative to peer class
> > loading and other mechanisms for code deployment.
> >
> > As promised, I've started drafting the IEP for this change [2]. Please
> let
> > me know your thoughts.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0#ApacheIgnite3.0-Meetups
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-59%3A+JAR-based+code+deployment
> >
> > -Val
> >
>
|