incubator-adffaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: AW: [Proposal] (re)naming issue
Date Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:32:49 GMT
I *DON'T* like ExternalContext because in a piece of code that uses 
both, you'll have to qualify the class with a package name.  Never a 
good idea in my book.  What about something cheezy like MyFacesContext?  
Does MyFaces already have a class like this?

G√ľnther wrote:
> Hi!
>
>   
>> More interesting are class names like AdfFacesContext.
>> Naming them TrinidadContext might not a good solution.
>> Note: This class is *not* extending FacesContext.
>>
>> ExternalContext might be a good name...
>> but... as we all know, this is already taken :)
>>     
>
> What about TrinidadRealm? ;-)
> No, but why would ExternalContext be better then TrinidadContext?
> Thanx for your patience if this happens to be a stupid question to ask.
>
> Regards,
> Thorsten
>
>
> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: mwessendorf@gmail.com [mailto:mwessendorf@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Matthias Wessendorf
> Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Juli 2006 23:49
> An: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: [Proposal] (re)naming issue
>
> Hey,
>
> since we closed ADFFACES-4 it is now time to start the renaming of the
> packages, since ADF is a no no.
>
> ADF-FACES-API
> package
> from
> org.apache.myfaces.adf.**
>
> to
> org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.**
>
> ADF-FACES-IMPL
> package
> from
> org.apache.myfaces.adfinternal.**
>
> to
> org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.internal.**
> (note trinidad DOT internal)
>
> More interesting are class names like AdfFacesContext.
> Naming them TrinidadContext might not a good solution.
> Note: This class is *not* extending FacesContext.
>
> ExternalContext might be a good name...
> but... as we all know, this is already taken :)
>
> Any ideas?
>
>   


Mime
View raw message